Chapter 1 Introduction Flashcards
Learning Objectives
- 1 Differentiate between qualitative and quantitative methods in research
- 2 Describe how the triangulation methodology is used in research
- 3 Analyze the general purpose of qualitative data
- 4 Examine symbolic interactionism as a school of thought of the social sciences
- 5 Recognize the significance of the right tools for effective qualitative research
General Orientations: Quantitative and Qualitative Research
Quantitative:
Uses numbers and statistics in the collection and analysis of data.
Qualitative:
Uses mainly words and other non-numeric symbols in the collection and analysis of data.
Qualitative data collection methods
Interviewing Focus groups Ethnography Unobtrusive methods Case studies Action research
The Relationship between Theory and Research
One way to conduct social scientific inquiry is through deduction.
Using deduction, one begins with a theory or explanation for something, then goes out into the world and tests it.
A most common approach to social research.
First, start with a theory or know something and try to go further and come up with idea to test it.
Another way to conduct inquiry is by using induction.
Here one begins by gathering or examining data, and then tries to derive a theory or explanation from the data.
Use of Triangulation
Point 1 – Research methods Various methods favored by researchers Impose perspectives on reality Canvassing, direct observation, content analysis, and so on Each method = different line of sight Point 2 – Triangulation Originally referred to surveying, navigation, and so forth First used as metaphor in social sciences Multiple operationalism, convergent validation Now, equals multiple-methods approach Requires fluency in multiple methods Point 3 – Denzin’s approach Multiple theoretical perspectives Multiple analysis techniques Multiple data-collection procedures Increases depth of understanding
Multiple Lines of Action in Triangulation
Research idea → multiple lines of action
E.g. multiple theories, researchers, data technologies
Lines of action → research findings
Qualitative Strategies: Defining an Orientation
We do not conduct research only to amass data
The purpose of research is to
Discover answers to questions through the application of systematic procedures
Research on human beings affects how these persons will be viewed
Main Goals of Qualitative
Empathy: seeing through the eyes of the people studied
In-depth description and emphasis on context
Emphasis on process: showing how events and patterns unfold over time
Flexibility and limited structure
Empathy: ability to understand others feeling or thoughts. On their spot , perspective.
Not sympathy, have sorry feeling for others
Looking for detail description ,
From a Symbolic Interactionist Perspective
Symbolic interactionism: “meanings as social products formed through activities of people interacting” Social interactions Negotiation of definitions Empathic role-taking Definitions of situation (eg. Sleep) Human behavior depends on learning Human interactions form the central source of data Participants’ perspectives form theory Definitions of situation (eg. Sleep)
Point 1 – Symbolic interactionism
One theoretical school of thought
Herbert Blumer; two “meaning” types
Meaning derived from interaction
Point 2 – Interactionist elements
Human interactions = central data source
Participant perspectives, empathy = key issues
Participant definitions of situation/setting
Point 3 – Different schools of thought
Iowa School
Twenty-statement test (TST)
Point 4 – Blumer versus Kuhn
Differences center on symbolic processes operation
Causality
Differences led to differing methodological approaches
Nongeneralizing/idiographic versus deterministic emphasis