Chapter 1: Introducing Psychological Science Flashcards
what are the steps of the scientific method?
- theory
- hypothesis
- test hypothesis
EITHER - confirm hypothesis (generate another new hypothesis, confirm and strengthen original theory) or
- reject hypothesis (discard/modify original hypothesis, revise og theory)
what are the qualities of good scientific hypotheses?
- must be testable
- must be falsifiable (needs to be able to be proven false)
- Must be stated in precise and relevant terms
what are qualities of good scientific theories?
- built from hypotheses
- must be falsifiable
- can be updated w/ new info
what is the difference btwn hypothesis and theories?
- hypothesis is a testable prediction about processes that can be observed and measured
- theory is an explanation for a broad range of observations, generates new hypotheses, integrate findings into a whole
- Not the same as opinions - has been Repeatedly tested and supported by data
- Not all theories are equally plausible
what is critical thinking?
- exercising curiosity and skepticism when evaluating the claims of others + w/ our own assumptions and beliefs
- Important w/ digital age where info can be skewed/manipulated
what does scientific literacy involve?
- Applying the scientific method
- Examining assumptions and biases (of others and our own)
- Considering alternative viewpoints
- Tolerating ambiguity when evidence is inconclusive
what are examples and violations of the principle of parsimony?
- ex. you drop something, someoe says the reason why it dropped is bc of gravity (causal factor). someone else says that the reason is bc there’s invisible entities that push the item to the ground. which of these explanations should we resort to? one explanation has 2 causal factors, and the other only has 1.
- violation: when psychologists attribute complex behaviour to complex brain processes
what is the principle of parsimony?
idea that the simplest of all competing explanations of a phenomenon should be the one we accept
what is empiricism?
idea that you can gain knowledge through experience (ex. Religious based schools of thought)
what is determinism?
all events can be explained through lawful cause-and-effect relationships (ex. If we have enough info about a behaviour, we should be able to make predictions), free will
what is zeitgeist? give example.
- general set of beliefs of a particular culture at a specific time in history, delaying science of psychology
- ex. ppl believed that earth is centre of the solar system and everything rotated around the earth
what is materialism? give example.
- belief that humans and other living beings are composed exclusively of physical matter
- ex. idea of a soul that isn’t physically based
what are the 4 early ideas that contributed to psychology becoming a science?
- ancient influence
- philosophical influences
- physic influences
- influences from evolutionary theory
what were the ancient influences to psychology becoming a science?
- hippocrates and the 4 humors (black bile, yellow bile, blood, phlegm)
- artistotle’s tabula rasa (when people are born, they’re not born bad/good but are born neutral and whether they turn out bad/good is based on their experiences (early form of empiricism)
- idea of psyche (“the mind”) being the source of all human behaviour
what were the philosophical influences to psychology becoming a science?
- Descartes proposed “cartesian dualism”, solution to mind-body problem (Is our mind apart of our body or diff from it?)
- believe mind and body are diff - body is material and physical, mind is nonmaterial/spiritual but both drive behaviour
- Problem is that his theory couldn’t explain how a nonphysical mind could interact and influence a physical material body (problem of the interactionism)
- Said that the pineal gland in the brain was the seat of the soul - allows our spirit to interact w/ the rest of our body
what were the physic influences to psychology becoming a science?
- Gustav fechner
- Developed psychophysics: study of the relationship btwn physical world and mental representation of that world
what is the difference btwn response expansion and response compression?
- we seem less sensitive (double the stimulus but we don’t double it in our own perceptions)
- Orange line: shows that w/ small changes in the actual objective intensity of a pain stimulus, we’re over exaggerating the pain experience