Chapter 1 - Family Flashcards
What is a nuclear family?
It is based on a 2 Generation household of parents and their children. Most modern families are characterised as such.
What is the family responsible for in society?
It is the basic unit of social organisation and one which carries out vital tasks, such as socialising the children.
George Peter Murdock discuss the universality of the family, what are his conclusions?
In his study ‘Social Structure’, he examined the institution in a variety of societies.
He took samples ranging from small hunting gathering tribes to large industrial societies.
Some sort of family existed in every society, proving it is universal.
How does Murdock characterise the family?
Social group characterised by common residence, economic cooperation and reproduction. It includes adults of both sexes, who maintain a socially approved sexual relationship, and one or more children, own or adopted.
Murdock discusses variations in norms if family from one society to another, his examples talks about the Banaro of New Guinea. What happens within their society?
The husband doesn’t have sexual relations with his wife, until she has borne a child by a friend of the fathers.
The parent-child relationship therefor doesn’t necessarily need to be a biological one.
Extended families are divided into 2 subcategories. What are they?
Vertical extensions: addition of a 3rd generation, such as grandparents
Horizontal extensions: addition if members of the same generation as the spouses, such as an uncle.
Kathleen Gough criticises Murdocks universality of the family. The example she uses to do so, is of a Southern Indian tribe called The Nayar. How so?
In Nayar society, before puberty girls were ritually married to suitable men. After the ritual took place however, they did not have to live together, and had no obligations to have contact with each other.
Her only duty to her husband was to attend their funeral.
Instead they had visiting husband, who they could have sexual intercourse with.
How was the Nayar tribe different to traditional family?
- No lifelong union, either could terminate at any point.
- Visiting husbands had no duty towards offspring of their wives.
- They did not form an economic unity, although tokens may be given they were not expected to maintain them. Instead the wives formed communities to take care of the children.
What is a matrilineal society?
Kinships groups are based in female biological relatives and marriage plays no significant part of the household.
Proving either that family’s are not universal, or Murdocks definition is too narrow.
What is a matriarchal family?
Female headed families, in which children are just raised by mothers and sometimes grandmothers too.
Callahan argues the validity of Murdocks definition of a family. Why so?
He argues that gay and lesbian households that consist of children, either through previous heterosexual relationship or adoption, should be considered as a family too.
What does Gittins say about the universality of the family?
Relationships are universal, so is some form of co-residence, of intimacy, sexuality and emotional bonds. But the forms these can take are infinitely variable and can be changed and challenged as well as embraced.
In a Functionalist perspective, what does Murdock say are the 4 basic functions of a family in all societies?
Sexual, reproductive, economic and educational.
All of which are essential for social life.
In Murdock’s eyes, the family functions for both the individual and society. How? - Functionalist.
Take for example the sexual function, on an individualistic level it provides sexual gratification in a restricting society, but also strengthens the family with the bonds and emotions attached to sex.
It also helps stabilise society, by containing sexual activity within a family, it causes less disruptive effects in so with. Thus the family provides both done control and expression of sexual drives.
Criticism of Murdock.
- He does not consider the possibility that alternatives to the family, could possible perform the same basic functions.
- His picture of family is too ideal.
Talcott Parsons argues that the family have 2 basic and irreducible functions. What are they? - Functionalism
They are the ‘primary socialisation of the children’ and the ‘stabilisation of the adult personalities of the population of the society’.
What is primary socialisation?
Socialisation during the early years of childhood, mainly takes lace within the family.
What is secondary socialisation?
Occurs during the later years, when the family is less involves and other agencies such as school and peers, exert increasing influence.
There are 2 basic processes involved in primary socialisation. What are they according to Parsons? - Functionalism.
Internalisation of society’s culture: culture needs to be absorbed and accepted or society would cease to exist, shared norms are needed.
Structuring of the personality: child’s personality is moulded in terms of central values of the culture, till they become part of him/her. Such as in America, achievement motivation and independence.
In Parson’s perspective why is stabilisation of adult personalities needed? - Functionalist
During primary socialisation our personality is produced, but it is the second function of the family to ensure it is kept stable, later on in life.
Emotional security if marriage should, outweigh the stresses and strain on everyday life ensuring personalities remain stable. Also provides context in which husband and wife can express their childish whims.
Criticism of Parsons. - Functionalism.
- As with Murdock, accused of idealising the family. It is portrayed as well adjusted children and sympathetic spouses. Optimistic.
- His picture is largely based on middle class America. (Morgan)
- Doesn’t explore functional alternatives to the family.
- Only takes into account how the parents mould their children, while ignoring that the opposite can take place too.
How did Friedrich Engels describe the origins of the family? - Marxism.
He combined Marxism with the evolutionary approach, arguing that as the mode of production changed, so did the family.
During the early stages of human evolution, the means of production were communally owned and families as such did not exist. This era is primitive communism, characterised by promiscuity.
How did Engels explain the evolution of families from primitive, promiscuous tribes?
Throughout history, more restrictions have been placed on sexual relationships. He speculates that from promiscuous hordes, marriage and family evolved into polygamy, then monogamous nuclear family.
This present day family emerged through the privatisation of property. Since the family developed in order to solve inheritance disputes.
What does Eli Zaretsky say that capitalism has done to the family? - Marxism
Prior to industrialisation the family was the basic unit of production. But as this transmitted to factory based work, the family life and work were separated. This caused family to be put on a pedestal, since it apparently provided opportunities for satisfaction that were unavailable outside the walls of the home.
However, it cannot meet the pressure of being the only refuge in a brutal society. It might cushion the effects of capitalism, but it perpetuates the system and cannot compensate for the alienation.
Furthermore, Zaretsky sees the family as major prop to capitalist society. Explain. - Marxism
The capitalist system is based upon the domestic labour of housewives who reproduce further generations of workers.
Also, the family has become a vital unit of consumption. The family consumes the products of capitalism, which allows the bourgeoisie to continue producing surplus value.
Criticism of Zaretsky. - Marxism
Jennifer Somerville: exaggerates the importance of family as a refuge from life in capitalist society.
Underestimates the extent of cruelty, violence, incest and neglect within families.
Exaggerates extent of separation of work from family life.
What does the feminist perspective say in general when it comes to family?
They argue that family life still disadvantages women in some ways.
They have challenged some widely held views about the inevitability of male dominance in households and questioned whether families really are egalitarian. Bringing to light certain topics such as the worth of housework and domestic violence, within society.
How do Marxist feminists differ to Marxists view on family?
Although Marxists such as Engels and Zatersky acknowledged the exploitation of women in family life, they emphasise the relationship between capitalism and the family.
Marxist feminist, on the other use Marxist concepts but see the exploitation as a key feature of family life.