Chapter 1 Flashcards
Natural Hazards and Disasters
What is the principal of uniformitarianism?
The Earth formed and continues to form as a result of slow, consistent processes.
What is the principal of catastrophism?
The Earth formed and continues to form as a result of short, brief catastrophic events (i.e. Earthquake, volcano.) This implies that the Earth is not that old.
What is the principal of Actualism?
The Earth formed, and continues to form as the result of slow, consistent processes that are periodically interrupted by catastrophic events.
What is a hazard?
Something that can cause problems or harm. (ex: BC Mountains)
What is a “natural hazard”
Some natural place, event or process that can cause harm.
What is a disaster or catastrophic event?
a (significant) event or process that has caused harm. (ex: Avalanche)
Define Exposure, give an example.
Exposure - proximity someone or something has to a hazard ex: high exposure beside a cliff, low exposure when you move away from the cliff.
What factors affect exposure?
Sensitivity and proximity, because a persons understanding of the hazards around them can keep them informed and aware which affects their exposure to the hazard.
Define Sensitivity. Given an example.
A measure of how someone or something may be affected by this hazard. (ex: Informed - less sensitive. uninformed - more sensitive.)
What resources are needed to reduce sensitivity?
- Information/education
- Plans to avoid, respond or recover from a hazard/ catastrophe.
- The material needs in place to support plan.
Explain Vulnerability. Give an example.
Combination of exposure and sensitivity. It takes into account a persons or places proximity to a hazard and their ability to deal with or to determine what will happen when a catastrophic event takes place.
What resources are necessary to reduce vulnerability in the event of a disaster?
reduce exposure meaning removing the hazard.
Discuss the relative differences between exposure, sensitivity and vulnerability as they pertain to mass wasting events, in mid-latitude regions (i.e. Canada) as compared to subtropical regions (i.e. El. Salvador).
For both these places, mass wasting in the form of avalanches and flows is a significant hazard. So both locations have a high degree of exposure.
Sensitivity however, is different. It is less in British Columbia because we are aware of the hazard and can avoid it. Sensitivity is higher in El Salvador because despite awareness, steep terrain is harder to avoid.
In El Salvador there is less land - it is a small country and land that is safer is often owned or controlled by others.
Why do people live near potentially dangerous natural areas?
- They are unaware of the hazard.
- They choose to ignore the hazard of downplay it.
- They have no choice.
What is the relationship between wealth and mortality rates during a natural disaster?
In a wealthy place where sensitivity is less the result of a catastrophic event is often property damage. Moralities are much less. In poorer ares where sensitivity is higher there is usually less property damage but mortality is higher. In Canada we have more (stuff) to break, but have good medical care.