Chapter 1 Flashcards
Most authoritative guidance for the auditor of a nonissuer is
General guidance provided by Statement on Auditing standards. Auditors are required to comply with SASs, and should be prepared to justify departures.
The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board was established by
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
When an auditor is unable to form an opinion on a new client’s opening inventory balances the auditor will issue an unmodified opinion on the current year’s
closing balance sheet only and will issue a disclaimer of opinion on the statements of income, retained earnings, and cash flows.
The basic element of an auditor’s report under US auditing standards is that
an audit includes evaluating significant estimates made by management.
There is no explicit reference, in an unmodified opinion on comparative financial statement, for
the examination of evidence on a test basis for comparative financial statements. The report says, “an audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements.”
A change in accounting principle (i.i., depreciation method) does result in an
emphasis-of-matter paragraph appended to an otherwise unmodified opinion, only when material. An immaterial effect on comparability does not require a emphasis-of-matter paragraph.
Confirming with third parties the details of arrangements to provide financial support is an audit procedure that may
identify doubts about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern. Inspecting title documents provides evidence of ownership of assets but would not identify conditions affecting an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.
Under US auditing standards, the auditor states that the audit was conducted in accordance with GAAS in the
Auditor’s Responsibility paragraph.
The auditor expresses an opinion on the financial statements’ conformity with GAAP in the
Opinion Paragraph.
When an auditor qualifies their opinion because of a scope limitation, the wording in the opinion paragraph should indicate the qualification pertains to the
possible effects on the financial statements and not the scope limitation itself.
If a company fails to present its statement of cash flows, the auditor would normally conclude
that the omission requires qualification of opinion. It is considered inadequate disclosure.
If an auditor concludes that there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern and that the entity’s disclosures are adequate, then the auditor should issue either
a unmodified report with an emphasis-of-matter paragraph or a disclaimer of opinion. An qualified opinion would be give if the disclosures were not adequately disclosed.
When management does not provide reasonable justification that a change in accounting principle is preferable and it presents comparative financials, the auditor should express a
qualified opinion each year that the financials initially reflecting the change are presented.
Under ISAs, the going concern period must be at least, but not limited to
twelve months from the date of financial statement audit.
Under US auditing standards, the going concern period cannot exceed
one year from the date of the financial statement audit.