Chap.3 Flashcards

1
Q

What is the tension between majority rule and the protection of minority’s constitutional rights?

A

Key Words:
“tyranny of the majority.” - De Tocqueville
fallacy: homogenous, interest, goals, plans, conditions, places, span
CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS OF MINORITY
Ex:
planet Mars
or
loses home for road building, child refused in local school, close proximation airport construction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are the strengths and weaknesses of direct democracy? What are the strengths and weaknesses of representative democracy?

A
Key Elements:
Direct Democracy
I. Strengths:
i) Citizens have political power
2. Disadvantages:
i) Decision making is slower
ii) Unclear who is responsible
iii) Tyranny of the majority - (strength of different individual's preferences)
iv) Limited vote
WHO IS ENTITLED TO VOTE?
iv) Gives unpopular less than equal chance

Representative Democracy
I. Strengths:
i) It simplifies the decision-making process.
ii) efficient
2. Disadvantages:
i) Representatives may distort peoples’ demands to suit their own political preferences.
ii) Representatives may not make themselves accountable enough between elections
iii) Gives the unpopular a less than equal chance

Ex. parking ticket price in front of dawson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the difference between proportional representation voting system and first past the post-voting system?

A
Key Words: 
Meaning
Constituency
Representative
Voting
Seats
Majority
Accountability
Clashing Ideas

Ex.
european parliament + Hitler
First past the post: united kingdom
1995 - 30% conservation, total seats 308 but solely 25 seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

According to Plato, why is democracy a bad form of government?

A
Key Words:
“by the people”
experts
demogogue
sophists

Ex.
“Craft Analogy” -> Navigation of ship, medical decisions, education, tend sheep, …

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is Plato’s response to the idea that democracy knows what people want better than philosopher kings?

A

Key words:
opportunity for corruption is minimized
avoid being ruled by others.
+ make great guardians by raising them young into the best ruler
full of knowledge, benevolence, and wisdom all powered through expertise in the arts of politics.

Ex.
ruling family or clique enriching themselves at the expense of their people would be impossible due to the lack of private property
Generals raise from the ranks of the army

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What does it mean that democracy is intrinsically valuable?

A

Key Words:
processes themselves as it ought to be expressive of freedom and equality.
liberty of political-decision making by the people as they are for the people. Equality lies in this freedom being given to all.

Ex.
Table hobbies
Captain drunk trip

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the difference between the general will and particular will?

A

Key Words:
general interest (rational will) + morally correct outcome or the common good
applied equally to all citizens, affects all citizens, and law rule

special interest
selfish, does therefore not affect everyone the same way, and the special interest rules over laws.

Ex.
Money division in company

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

According to Rousseau, how should laws be made in a popular assembly?

A
Key Words: 
question
moral
common good
As taking a test
rational 
in average people have a better right-to-even choice of being right, the outcome will reflect the general will (people are inherently good). Rousseau also belive people are smalt and will research.

Ex.
The law banning smoking in restaurants → does this law follow the general will? → yes → vote, no → do not vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

According to Rousseau, how should the society motivate citizens to follow the general will?

A
Key Words:
simplifying society
education (form good habits in order to build good character), 
censorship,
civil religion
social sentiments
escape
good habits 

Ex.
Censorship→ drunk youngsters threw up in the tribunal → state issued a law saying everyone is allowed to throw up in the tribunal → to shame and remind
Civil religion → A mother who’s five sons served war, the slaves of the family came back from war sons were all killed but won → mother aks: did you win? Not if her sons were alive → why? sons were sent by god

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the positive notion of freedom?

A

Key Words:
freedom of living the life that a rational person would choose to live.

Ex:
Mike the alcoholic

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

According to Mill, why is democracy better than the good despotism?

A

Key Words:
Democracy = exercise
growth through inde
Positive depotism: “unlimited, unchecked, unrestricted totalitarian exercise of governmental powers, also a system of rule whereby the rights and liberties of individuals are ignored”pendence

Ex.
Greek cities and persian empires vs italian republics or feudal monarchies vs Holland and Switzerland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

According to Mill, What is the open vote?

A

Key Words:
Accountibility
self-interest
coercion (threat of losing job)
neutreulizing stupidity and ignorance
“read, write, aretmithics”
“first principle” –> welfare = disqualification
disqualification if paid (if one’s labour cannot suffice him he has no right to gain privilege –> not equal)
those who are especially qualified to express judgement should have more than a vote

Ex.
public voting about if smoking should be allowed in restaurants. The pressure of others could lead to a result which is safer for people.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is Locke’s labor mixing argument?

A

Basic Idea: If you do something, it is exclusively yours. Someone else needs permission to use it.
Elaboration: It has two premises. 1. You own your labour. It’s as if your labour is an extension of your body, and you own your body.
2. In labouring on an object, you mix your labour with it.
Conclusion: As long as that object was not already justly claimed by another, you own that object you have laboured. (providing you leave enough and as good for others)
Examples: It justifies the appropriation of land (if you grow crops on a land and take care of it, technically this land should be yours), as well as nuts and berries. Those who are the first to work on a plot of land should be entitled to keep it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What is the problem with the labor mixing argument?

A

Key Words:
Robert Nozick
natural states (so unowned or owned by everyone)
not only about mixing but labour

Eg. Tomato juice

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is Locke’s value added argument?

A

Key Words:
Improve the earth through private property. In laboring an object you added its value immensely so you come to own that object.
Change

Eg.
Land

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the problem with the value added argument?

A

Key Words:
You may be allowed to own the value which you’ve increased but you should not be able to own the object.
proviso, “enough as good”

Eg.
land

17
Q

What is Rawls’ difference principle?

A

Key Words:
Derrived from the principles of juctice
That social and economic distribution should favourize the less advantaged to create equal opportunities.
Eggalitarian principle
equal distribution of goods among citizens
inequality

it gives no place for incentives

eg.
In a company… Raise the salary of people on minimum wage or raise the salary of the people that are doing important and more difficult stuff but that are quite rich?

18
Q

According to Rawls, why are people in the original position unbiased?

A

Key Words:

“veil of ignorance” –> race, social status, conceptions of good, more and philosophical

self-interest

eg.
poker game
coach

19
Q

What is the maximize-the-average-value theory of rational choice?

A

Basic Idea: It is to make choices that ensure the best average value.
Elaboration: For each choice we have, there’s the need to derive an average value (expected utility) of what they’re worth. Then, we have to pick the option with the highest average. It generally shows quite a safe option. The probability of being satisfied is quite high. People choosing to maximise the average value are looking for the outcome with the highest average score. Point of view: we should make the average position in society as good as possible.
Examples: Example of the restaurant. Honey 5 (100%), bear 20 (90%), -100 (10%) → 8, river pig 1000 (99.9%), death (0.1%)

20
Q

What is the maximin theory of rational choice?

A
key words:
To make the choice to ensure the best of worst outcomes. 
avoids risk
makes the worst off as well as possible
no chance of bad outcome

eg.
road

21
Q

Why people in the original position would only follow the maximin theory of rational choice?

A

Key Words:
constraints
“everyone should live in a palace”
circumstances of justice –> abundance and scarcity –> choice must be most productive –> physical constraints

choice must be logical as logical constraints –> “everyone should be richer than everyone else”

formal constraints that reflect the idea of hypothetical contract *morally defensible principles of justice. Rather Rawls claims that people would agree to such principles under certain specific conditions.

publicity

finality (if made in good faith) irreversible, compensation, strains of comitment
do not gamble liberty all or nothing, no long-run
ACTUAL CIRCUMSTANCES OF SOCIETY –> cannot give social minimum (constrained maximization)
–> DIFFERENCE PRINCIPLE
eg.
hospital bed –> choose unequal society –> do baddly –> want system changed
gamble for wage (50 pounds) increase 50 - 150 pounds chance not possible because of finality