ch3 SA Flashcards
1
Q
distinguish betw developing & emerging eco
A
developing
- low LS
- agri based
- poor infrastructure
by contrast, emerging
- process industrialisation
- sustained EG
2
Q
discuss impact of TNCs on emerging ecos
A
- global companies w/ prod facilities 2/+ c’s, owned by residents of 2/+ c’s
- bring adv tech & PPs to emerging ecos, ^ EG & incomes
- but large prop profits repatriated to owners in other c’s, not spent on emerging c
- gvts in emerging ecos reduce labour & enviro regs & corp tax rates to attract TMCS –> reduce QOL
3
Q
descrube the global distr of income & wealth
A
- high lvl inequality in global distr income
- HI ecos (US, AUS) ~15% global pop but earn ~50% GWP adjusted for PPP
- wealth distributed more unevently than income (over 90% world’s wealth held by inds in EUR, NAmerica, AsiaPacific, far lower lvls in India, Africa, Latin America
- but recent yrs improved global inequality income (Measured betw c’s bc strog growth in c’s
4
Q
analyse the reasons for differences in income levels between nations
A
- diffs bc structural factors in global eco & characteristics of ind ecos.
- global lvl: rules global trade system less favourable to poorer c’s since hightest trade barriers exist for agri commodities rely heavily export revenue, intellectual proporty rules favour welathier c’s
- rules GFS reflect priorities of larger wealthier ecos most influential in int orgs (IMF, WB)
- many developing ecos large foreign debt burdens incur dig interest repayments –> reduce ability gvt fund instrastructure to ^EG.
- c’s lower labour supply & quality due to worse health standards & edu lvls less productive –> lower EG & income lvls
5
Q
assess the potential impact on the enviro of EG
A
- continued EG –> higher GWP, –> ^ production –> ^ use natural resources & produce pollution & waste –> degrade enviro
- poorer c’s ^ lvl dev can be more willing to impose enviro regs even if deters some FDI –> improve enviro sustainability
- global eco grows by usign more sustainable energy sources & techs –> possibly strengthen EG w/o neg consequences
- hence, continuing world eco development mixed impact enviro
6
Q
for China, analyse the strats gvt used to respond to globalisation
A
this for indonesia tho
- recent decades, gradually adopted policies embracingglobalisation
- since 1980s shifted from policy of … towards (export led?) development, reducing tariffs..
- member of WTO
- TNCs attract FDI, companies est manuf operations
- liberalised financial flows but pos & neg effects (financial crisis 90s, currency depreciated)
- emerging from recession caused by covid, policy priorities included investments in infrastrutrue & skills to make more attractive destination for foreing investment
7
Q
positive & neg impacts of globalisation on EG
A
POSITIVE
- EG generally higher in c’s opened their markets to global trade & foreign investment
NEGATIVE
- Adv ecos msot globally integrated but comparatively weak growht last 2 decades
- globalisation era: many destabilising events (GFC, COVID)
8
Q
positive & neg impacts of globalisation on ED
A
POSITIVE
- emerging & developing ecos benefit from ^QOL (resources for edu &hc)
- some c’s, convergence in LS
NEGATIVE
- globalisation –> ^income inequality w/n c’s –> lower ED & accelerate CC
9
Q
positive & neg impacts of globalisation on income inequality
A
POSITIVE
- ^pay & expand int. emp opps benefits highly skilled workers
- pops of emerging ecos ^ income lvls w/ sig falls absolute poverty
NEG
- inequality w/n c’s widen
- adv ecos, betw highly skilled workers vs import competing sectors
- emerging ecos: cities & manuf sectors vs rural areas
10
Q
positive & neg impacts of globalisation on FMs
A
POS
- ecos ^ access overseas funds for investment –> ^EG & income/wealth
NEG
- lower FDI for less developed c’s relative to adv ecos
- ^ST financial flows destabilising impact c’s
11
Q
epositive & neg impacts of globalisation on enviro sustainability
A
POS
- opps c’s to collab on enviro preservation (int mechanisms eg. exchange carbon credits)
- ^ global scrutiny of enviro practices
- facilitate transfer new tech to improve energy efficiency
NEG
- some c’s seek attract foreign investment may not consider social costs prod
- gain ST eco adv by attracting investors want lower costs by neglecting enviro impacts of prod –> more companies harm enviro