Ch.3 - Neopatrimonialism Flashcards
What was the logic of instrumentalisation of disorder?
By neglecting bureaucracies, political elites can respond to demands through dyadic exchanges: protection and assistance in exchange for political support
What is elite co-option?
A strategy used by political elites to weaken opposition groups by buying off group leaders (appointments, contracts, etc.). The goal is essentially to incorporate dissents into state patronage networks and in turn group leaders urge others to stop opposing the regime.
Neo-patrimonialism enjoyed legitimacy among elites and citizens. How did both groups use the system?
Political elites: sought to distribute state resources to support base in order to remain in power and keep a portion of state benefits to themselves
Citizens: sought to elect representatives who they viewed as agents whose job is to bring state benefits (jobs, loans, cash, etc.) to their local community
When are neo-patrimonial systems most unstable?
During times of political or economic crises, especially when faced with a group that is both marginalized and organized.
What determines a neo-patrimonial regime’s duration?
Ability to:
1) effectively manage political opponents
2) ensure that sufficient resources are trickled down to their clients
What is the legitimate of patrons in neo-patrimonial regimes based on?
Their ability to satisfy their clientele.
What negative consequence does the instrumentalisation of disorder have on the state?
Negligence of developing state institutions impacted regime’s ability to crush rebellions.
What kind of economic policies increased the likelihood of economic crises?
1) closed markets
2) distortion of key prices
3) heavy control of markets and industry
What are the pathways to violence in neo-patrimonial systems?
1) economic or political crisis
2) democratization (transition from pure autocracy)
What external factor can increase chance of economic crises?
Withdrawal of aid from donors; hence a loss of a crucial source of revenue.
What are consequences of less benefits trickling down on regime security?
Less benefits = loss of legitimacy = increasing chance of revolt from below
What is the major objective of most armed groups facing a neo-patrimonial regime?
To gain control of resources and commercial networks that sustain patrimonial systems
What often reduced the ability of regimes to fight off rebellions?
Paranoid African leaders often kept their armies weak and ill equipped and therefore unable to fight off rebellions
Are political and economic crises inevitable?
It’s possible for NP regimes to experience economic/political crises and avoid civil war. Groups with grievances still need to overcome collective action problems (think feasibility thesis)
What increases the risk of political crisis?
When segments of the population feel relatively deprived or excluded from political processes that affect them