CH29 - Risk transfer Flashcards
When faced with a risk, each stakeholder needs to decide whether to (6)
- avoid the risk altogether
- reduce the risk (probability, severity or both)
- reject the need for financial coverage, e.g. if a risk is trivial or largely diversified
- retain in full
- transfer in full (through payment of a premium)
- partly retain and partly transfer
The choice of mitigation approach will depend on (5)
- impact on frequency, consequence and severity of the risk
- feasibility and cost of implementation
- overall impact of each option on profit (on distribution of NPV)
- secondary risks arising (a strategy that reduces one element of risk could introduce an additional)
- how secondary risks might be dealt with (e.g. insurance with several insurers to minimise default risk)
The extent of risk transfer will depend on (5)
The extent to which a stakeholder will choose to pass on all or some of the risk will depend on several factors
- probability of the risk occurring
- risk appetite and
- existing resources to finance the risk event if it happens
- cost of transferring the risk
- willingness of a third party to accept the risk
Reinsurance - benefits and costs
The benefits of reinsurance have to be weighted up against the cost. The reinsurance premium will include loadings for profits and contingencies.
Reinsurance - benefits (3)
- A reduction in claims volatility and hence
- smoother profits
- reduced capital requirements
- an increased capacity to write more business and achieve diversification - The limitation of large losses arising from
- a single claim on a single risk
- a single event
- cumulative events
- geographical and portfolio concentrations of risk
and hence
- a reduced risk of insolvency
- increased capacity to write larger risks - Access to the expertise of the re-insurer
Types of reinsurance (2)
The two main types of reinsurance are
- proportional
- non-proportional
Reinsurance may be arranged on (3)
- A case-by-case basis
- A non-obligatory basis (‘facultative’)
- An obligatory basis using a treaty
Proportional reinsurance
Under proportional reinsurance, the reinsurer covers an agreed proportion of each risk.
This proportion may:
- be constant for all risks covered (i.e. quota share)
- vary by risk covered (i.e. surplus)
Both forms have to be administered automatically, and therefore require a treaty.
Quota share reinsurance
Quota share reinsurance is widely used by ceding providers to spread risk, write larger portfolios of risk and encourage reciprocal business.
Advantages(1) and disadvantages(2) of quota share reinsurance
+
1. It is simple to administer.
-
- Cedes the same proportion of low variance and high variance risks and of small and large risks
- Does not cap the cost of very large claims
Surplus reinsurance treaty
A surplus reinsurance treaty specifies a retention limit and a maximum level of cover available from the reinsurer.
The proportion of risk ceded is the used in the same way as for quota share. The retention limit may be fixed for all risks or variable at the discretion of the cedant.
Advantages of surplus reinsurance treaty
- Surplus cover enables a ceding provider to write larger risks, which might otherwise be beyond it writing capacity.
- It is flexible and enables the ceding provider to “fine-tune” its experience for the class concerned.
Non-proportional reinsurance
Under excess of loss reinsurance the reinsurer agrees to indemnify the ceding company for the amount of any loss above a stated excess point.
Usually, the reinsurer will give cover up to a stated upper limit, with the insurer purchasing further layers of XL cover, which stack on top of the primary layer, from different reinsurers.
Different forms of non-proportional reinsurance (4)
- Risk XL - relates to individual losses and affects only one insured risk at any one time
- Aggregate XL - covers the aggregate of losses, above an excess point and subject to an upper limit, sustained from defined peril (or perils) over a defined period, usually one year
- Stop loss - a form of aggregate XL that provides cover based on total claims, from all perils on a ceding company’s whole account (or a major class of business)
- Catastrophe XL - pays out if a ‘catastrophe’, as defined in the reinsurance contract, occurs (there is no standard definition of what constitutes a catastrophe)
The main uses of excess of loss reinsurance (3)
- To permit a ceding provider to accept risks that could lead to large claims
- To stabilise the results of the ceding provider by reducing claims fluctuations
- To reduce the risk of insolvency from large losses