Ch.2 Ethics In Research Flashcards
How to give equitable treatment to subjects?
- Give informed consent (with infants: the parents’ assent)
- safety
- No deception (unless necessary)
- Protect vulnerable groups (children, developmentally delayed, prisoners)
What does the Belmont Report’s main points about treating subjects fairly?
- Give respect of person: protection from vulnerable populations and the right to their autonomy
- Beneficence: minimize risks and maximize benefits
- Justice: don’t test on one group that benefits another
What are the main APA guidelines for the ethical experimentation on animals?
- treat them humanely
- only use pain, deprivation or stress when absolutely necessary
- in surgery, be as careful and safe as possible
- have personnel trained in animal care
What does IRB stand for?
Institutional Review boards
What is an IRB?
An ethics organization that ensures experimentation is ethical by reviewing proposals in human subject research
What members conform an IRB?
- Scientists
- Non-scientists
- non-university community members
What does IACUC stand for?
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee
What are the tasks of IACUC’s?
- Review research proposals involving animal subjects
- Inspect animal facilities every 6 months
- Evaluate personnel qualifications
What personnel do IACUC’s include?
- Vet(s)
- Researchers
- Non-scientists
- Someone affiliated with the university
What is Cherry Picking or “fishing”?
Probing your data until you get the desired result in favor (fabricating data in the worst-case scenario)
What are the consequences of Scientific misconduct?
- The principal investigator gets fired
- The PI needs to pay all the funding back
- Other people’s careers are affected
- Ineffective treatment for diseases
- We don’t know what’s true
What ISN’T considered Scientific misconduct?
- Getting a false positive (Type I Error)
- Doing an analysis wrong
- miscommunicating (accidentally or deliberately)
What are some questionable research practices?
- Only publishing positive results
- Coming up with a new hypothesis when finding something weird in experimentation to fit your data better (“HARKing”)