Ch1: Criminal justice system Flashcards
What are the 5 things that lawyers should be looking at for evidence?
- Admissibility
- relevance to a fact in issue
- strength
- credibility
- weight
What does voir dire mean?
Any arguments as to whether a certain piece of evidence is admissible must be conducted in the absence of the jury.
What is a certificate of readiness?
Each party confirming that the directions have been complied with and witnesses are ready.
What does Rule 3.9 say?
Allows for a case to progress in a defendant’s absence if necessary.
What does Rule 3.7 say?
Allows the parties by agreement (i.e. without application to the court) to vary a time limit provided it would not have a consequential effect on any subsequent time limits or hearings.
What should you tell the detainee if you have been instructed to act by someone other than the client?
- The detainee must be told the solicitor has come to the police station at another’s request
- The detainee must be asked to sign the custody record to signify whether they want to see the solicitor.
What is DSCC and what do they do?
Defence Solicitor Call Centre.
They manage and allocate police station duty solicitor work.
What is the remit of an ‘own interest conflict’?
An actual or significant risk of your client’s interests conflicting with your own interests in relation to that or a related matter
What is the remit of a ‘client conflict’?
An actual or significant risk of your new client’s interests conflicting with the interest of one or more other clients in relation to that or a related matter.
What are the 4 issues you should consider when dealing conflict of interests in criminal litigation?
- Neither client’s interests are prejudiced
- Each client’s confidentiality is protected
- You are in a position to disclose material information and the court is not misled;
- Your independence is not prejudiced by your own commercial interests.
What should you consider when accepting instructions from more than one client in the same matter?
You need to assess not only whether there is a conflict at the outset, but whether the case is likely to develop in such a way that you will be unable to act at a later stage in the proceedings.
What are the steps of avoiding conflict?
- Take instructions from C1 and when doing so advise C1 that you have been asked to act for C2 and that you can only do so if there is no conflict
- Ask C1 if he is aware of any conflict; if he states that there is, or might be, a conflict ask C1 for full details.
- If these amount to a conflict, you cannot act for C2.
- If they do not amount to a conflict, inform C1 of this and that you will be able to act for C2.
- Inform C1 that if, at any stage, you come into possession of confidential information which is confidential to C1, but which is relevant to C2, you will have to disclose it to C2, at which stage you will need his consent to disclose it to C2.
How long does the duty to protect confidential information lasts?
Forever.
Even after termination of the retainer or the client’s death, unless the client allows disclosure or waives the confidentiality or if the duty is overridden - e.g. by statute or by the information coming into the public domain.
Can you use information from one client’s case to help another?
If at any stage you receive confidential information from one client that is relevant to the other client you must inform C1 of this and seek his consent to disclose it to C2.
What is the next step if C1 does not consent to disclose confidential information to help C2?
You must cease to act for C2 as he is the client to whom you are required to disclose the information.
The duty of confidentiality always overrides the duty of disclosure.
You must not disclose your reasons for ceasing to act.
You can only continue to act for C1 if the duty of confidentiality to C2 is also not put at risk.
What happens when a client instructs you to withhold documentary evidence which is prejudicial to his case, but which is required to be disclosed pursuant to a court order?
Your duties to the court under will mean that you cannot continue acting for the client unless he authorises disclosure of the prejudicial document.
What is the question that you need to ask yourself when you are representing clients who tell you that they have committed the offence but wish to deny involvement?
Is the client proposing to assert his innocence or put the prosecution to proof?
Provided the defendant does nothing to actually maintain his innocence your position as his solicitor is not in jeopardy.
You are not misleading the court as you are not allowing him to put forward false evidence.
What does not maintaining an innocence even if your client has committed a crime means?
The defendant is simply waiting to see if the prosecution can establish a case to answer.
His entering a not guilty plea is NOT in itself misleading the court.
What professional conduct do you have to be aware of when clients are innocent but wish to plea guilty?
It is for the client to enter his plea so long as he does so unequivocally and having been fully advised.
You cannot make submissions in his mitigation which you know to be false as you would be submitting inaccurate information.