Ch 9 - Concepts Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
0
Q

Ross and Murphy

A

Sorting task: eggs sometimes classified as a breakfast food, sometimes as a dairy product

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

Bruner et al.

A

Categorising is to make different things equivalent, responding to them as members of that group, not to their uniqueness.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Barsalou

A

Categorisation reflects a person’s goals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Eco

A

Platypus- categorisation is complex

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Macintyre

A

The diagnosis of ME is based on one major criterion plus 4 out of 8 minor criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bruner et al

A

People do categorise using necessary and sufficient conditions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Rosch

A

Asked ppts to state ‘goodness of exemplar’ of several instances.
Fruit= fruity
Olive=\ fruity

Therefore categories have internal structure

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Barsalou: Rosch

A

Typicality does not correlate with frequency. Penguins would be atypical if we lived in the South Pole.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Rips et al.
also
Rosch

A

Sentence verification:

‘A robin is a bird’ verified faster than ‘A penguin is a bird.’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Rosch and Mervis

A

Property/attribute listing method:

Less typical instances have fewer properties in common with other category members.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Problems with classical view? (TrILBy)

A

1) typicality
2) intransitivity of categories
3) lack of definitions
4) borderline cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Borderline cases- evidence?

A

McCloskey n Glucksberg- bookends

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intransitivity- evidence?

A

Hampton- car seats

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Lack of definitions- evidence?

A

Wittgenstein- games (not proof, just evidence)

Putman, Kripke- robot cats thought experiment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Rosch’s belief aggregation of characteristics

A

Certain attributes cluster together in nature, eg. Feathers, wings, beak, ability to fly.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Problems with prototype theory

Mic

A

meaning (what does typicality mean?/instability/context-sensitivity
complex concepts

16
Q

‘Meaning of typicality’ - evidence?

A

Armstrong et al. - definitional concepts, eg. odd number/even number show typicality effects

17
Q

Armstrong

A

Proposed dual-process model: classical view = core

Prototype theory = identification procedures

18
Q

Roth n shoben

A

Typicality effects changed by linguistic context, eg. riding/milking cow/horse

19
Q

Medin n Shoben

A

Spoon eg.:

The contribution of large/small to typicality depends on whether spoon is made of wood/metal - instability of typicality depending on context

20
Q

Why instability is a problem

A
  • it is at odds with Rosch’s argument that prototypes are clusters of correlated properties reflecting the natural world
  • if diagnostic power of attributes can change, what does that mean about typicality?
  • the contribution made by different properties to typicality (eg spoon size vs material)
21
Q

Fodor

A

Complex concepts create problems for most theories of concepts

22
Q

Hampton, using mcCloskey n Glucksberg’s data

A

Typicality is a good predictor, explaining 46-96% of variance of categorisation probability

23
Q

Hampton, using McCloskey n Glucksberg’s data - factors other than typicality

A

familiarity/lack thereof

‘Technicality’ of membership

24
Q

‘Similarity is a quack’

A

Goodman- not similarity, just ‘sharing properties with’ - so not ‘similarity’ that’s driving categorisation at all

25
Q

Lawn mowers and plums- who?, n what did they conclude?

A

Murphy n Medin

Similarity is shorthand for something else that makes categories coherent

26
Q

Murphy n Medin’s idea n example they used

A

Concepts are explanation based, eg intoxicated explains jumping into pool

27
Q

Pizza/quarter study:

Who? What does it show?

A

Rips

More similar to a quarter/more likely to be a pizza
Shows dissociation between similarity/what it is. This means ‘being’ and ‘similarity’ are not the same.

28
Q

Kroska n goldstone

A

Ppts categorised some scenarios as ‘fear’, but more similar to joy.