CH 7 - Production and Growth Flashcards
growth rate
how rapidly real GDP per person grew in the typical year
productivity
the quantity of goods and services that a worker can produce for each hour of work
-> A nation can enjoy a high standard of living only if it can produce a large quantity of goods and services
Determinants of productivity
- Physical Capital (K) per Worker (K/L): stock of equipment and structures that are used to produce G&S (or just capital)
- Human Capital (H) per Worker: economist’s term for the knowledge and skills that workers acquire through education, training, and experience (includes accumulated lifelong skills) / effort people exert to gain more knowledge
- Natural Resources (N) per Worker: inputs into production that are provided by nature, such as land, rivers, and mineral deposits
- Technical Knowledge (A): the understanding of the best ways to produce goods and services / new ideas, products and processes for producing G&S (common and proprietary knowledge)
difference between technological knowledge and human capital
TK refers to society’s understanding about how the world works. HC refers to the resources expended transmitting this understanding to the labour force. (ex. TK- textbooks, HC- time pop has dedicated to read them)
Production Function
Y = AF(L,K,H,N)
Y - quantity of output, L - quantity of labour, K - quantity of physical capital, H -quantity of human capital, N - quantity of natural resources
importance of saving
Capital is a produced factor of production => society can change the amount of capital it has (by producing more capital they can produce more G&S) => one way to raise future productivity is to invest more current resources in the production of capital
-> for society to invest more in capital, it must consume less and save more of its current income
diminishing returns
As the stock of capital rises, the extra output produced from an additional unit of capital falls. In other words, when workers already have a large quantity of capital to use in producing goods and services, giving them an additional unit of capital increases their productivity only slightly.
catch up effect
other things equal, it is easier for a country to grow fast if it starts out relatively poor.
-> workers lack tools = low productivity = small amounts of capital investment would substantially raise these workers’ productivity
-> workers in rich countries already have large amounts of capital to work with -> additional investment would have a relatively small effect on productivity
FDI and FPI
FDI (foreign direct investment): capital investment that is owned and operated by a foreign entity
FPI (foreign portfolio investment): investment financed with foreign money but operated by domestic residents (ex. buying stocks)
effects of foreign investment
-> GDP is income earned within a country but some of the income from the investment generates accrues to people who do not live in that country. As a result, foreign investment in that country raises the income of its citizens by less than it raises the production in the country (measured by GDP).
-> increases the economy’s stock of capital, leading to higher productivity and higher wages = one way for poor countries to learn the state-of-the-art technologies developed and used in richer countries
World Bank
-> obtains funds from the world’s most advances countries and uses them to make loans to less-developed countries so they can invest in roads, sewer systems, schools, etc.
-> offers advice about how to use funds
-> set up after WW2 with IMF (International Monetary Fund)
Importance of education
-> Canada - each year of schooling has historically raised a person’s wage on average by about 10 percent (gap even bigger in less-developed countries)
-> Human capital conveys positive externalities (the effect of one person’s actions on the well-being of a bystander) => return to schooling for society is even greater than the return for the individual
Brain drain
emigration of many of the most highly educated workers to rich countries, where these workers can enjoy a higher standard of living
-> If human capital does have positive externalities, then this brain drain makes those people left behind poorer than they otherwise would be
-> however, this benefits the rich/developed countries that welcome this labour / students
does brain drain happen in developed countries
Yes, even countries like Canada see their workers leave for higher paying jobs in the US
Some suggest cutting taxes (to make incomes more comparable), others suggest improvements to Canada’s social programs as well as investments in better education and improved health care
health and nutrition
-> improved gross nutrition accounts for roughly 30 percent of the growth of per capita income in Britain between 1790 and 1980
-> In developing nations, poor health and inadequate nutrition remain obstacles to higher productivity and improved living standards
-> Vicious circle -> Poor countries are poor in part because their populations are not healthy, and their populations are not healthy in part because they are poor and cannot afford adequate health care and nutrition