Ch. 6/8 Price Controls and Taxation Flashcards
Suppose that market demand is given by QD = 1000 - 5 P, while market supply is given by QS = 15 P - 600. If a price ceiling of $60 is imposed on this market, which of the following is incorrect?
A deadweight loss of $24,000 occurs.
The market clearing price is 1600 = 20P, which is P = $80. Since the ceiling is below $80, it is binding.
In the free market, consumer surplus is 1/2 * 600 * (200 - 80) = $36,000. With the price ceiling, CS = 300 * (140-60) + 300 * (200-140)/2 = $33,000.
DWL = 1/2 * (600-300) * (140-60) = $12,000.
With the ceiling, quantity supplied is 300 and quantity demanded is 700, creating a shortage of 400 units.
PS = 1/2 * 300 * (60-40) = $3,000.
If the equilibrium price of corn is $5 per bushel but the minimum legal price is $6 per bushel,
any possible increase in producer surplus would be smaller than the loss of consumer surplus.
Suppose the equilibrium price of a physical examination (“physical”) by a doctor is $200, which has some-what elastic supply and demand. If the government imposes a price floor of $250 per physical,
the quantity demanded of physicals decreases and the quantity of physicals doctors want to give increases.
Suppose the federal government places a binding price ceiling on tuition prices. Which of the following could not happen as a result?
Colleges may offer discounts through “scholarships” not based on scholastic achievement.
A candidate promises to tax cosmetic surgery. He promises that all of the tax will be borne by cosmetic surgeons, not their patients. He also promises that it will not create any inefficiency in cosmetic surgery. These claims are
only true if supply is perfectly inelastic.
The party with less elasticity feels most of the tax burden. If cosmetic surgeons feel the full burden of the tax, either supply is perfectly inelastic or demand is perfectly elastic.
If demand is elastic, then quantity will change after the tax. Supply must be perfectly inelastic.
A senator claims: “US consumers drink 20 billion bottles of soda per year. A $1 / bottle tax will raise $20 billion of tax revenue, and fight obesity by reducing soda consumption by 20%.” This statement is
contradictory for any degree of elasticity.
To raise $20 billion of tax revenue, the quantity of soda must not change after the tax. This contradicts the senator’s second claim of reducing soda consumption by 20%.
Suppose the City of Provo is debating whether to impose an tax increase on auto sales or on boat sales. A study determines that both markets have about the same market price and quantity and elasticity of demand, but that supply for boats is significantly more elastic than supply for autos. If the City wants to maximize _______ they should tax ________.
consumer surplus; autos
Boats are more elastic, so quantity will fall by more, producing less revenue and more DWL (less efficiency) compared to a tax on cars.
However, this does force consumers to pay a larger fraction of the tax. Producers pay a larger fraction of the tax on cars.
Since demand is similar in the markets and the quantity changes less in the car market, consumer surplus is larger in the car market than boat market.
Assume that the demand for milk is relatively inelastic and that the demand for orange juice is relatively elastic, while their supply and equilibrium price and quantity are similar. Compared to a tax of similar size on orange juice, a tax on milk would create
More tax revenue
The mayor is considering taxing bike repair or ski repair. Both share the same price, same quantity, and same elasticity of supply, but the demand for bike repair is more inelastic. He says that he wants to raise as much tax revenue as possible while having suppliers pay most of the tax. You should advise him that
he cannot achieve both goals taxing one good.
Ski repair is more elastic, so quantity will fall by more, producing less revenue and more DWL (less efficiency) compared to a tax on bike repairs.
However, this does force producers to pay a larger fraction of the tax. Producers pay a smaller fraction of the tax on bike services.
The mayor’s goals are conflicting: to raise more revenue he should tax bike repair; to have suppliers pay most of the tax he should tax ski repair.
Suppose demand in a market is depicted by Qd = 200 - 4 P and supply is depicted by Qs = 2 P - 40. If a price ceiling of $50 is imposed, then the market will
clear. (reach equilibrium)
The market clearing price would be where 200 - 4P = 2P - 40, or P* = 40. Since the price ceiling is above this, it is non-binding and thus the market behaves as if there is no price control (and clears).
Compared to equilibrium, a binding price floor will always generate larger
Deadweight Loss
If the government removes a binding price ceiling from a market, then the price received by sellers will
increase, and the quantity sold in the market will increase.
A binding price ceiling means the price was held below its market clearing level.
On removing the ceiling, price will rise. This will encourage sellers to produce more, and this will be purchased by the consumers who had been unable to buy it under the shortage.
A candidate promises to tax cosmetic surgery. He promises that all of the tax will be borne by cosmetic surgeons, not their patients. He also promises that it will not create any inefficiency in cosmetic surgery. These claims are
only true if supply is perfectly inelastic.
The party with less elasticity feels most of the tax burden. If cosmetic surgeons feel the full burden of the tax, either supply is perfectly inelastic or demand is perfectly elastic.
If demand is elastic, then quantity will change after the tax. Supply must be perfectly inelastic.
Suppose that app purchases and music purchases have similar price, quantity, and demand elasticity, but the supply of apps is more elastic than the supply of music. If a $1 tax is added for each song or app purchased, we would expect to see:
greater inefficiency in the apps market.
a larger portion of the tax paid by song producers than app producers.
Apps are more elastic, so quantity will fall by more, producing less revenue and more DWL (less efficiency).
However, this does force consumers to pay a larger fraction of the tax. Song producers pay a larger portion of the tax than app producers.
The State of Utah has decided to tax all goods but not services. Suppose that supply elasticities are the same for goods and services, but that services have a demand elasticity of -2, compared to that of goods with an elasticity of -5. Which of the following goals are achieved by taxing goods but not services?
Sellers pay a larger percentage of the goods tax than they would of the services tax.
Goods are more elastic, so quantity will fall by more, producing less revenue and more DWL (less efficiency) compared to a tax on services.
However, this does force producers to pay a larger fraction of the tax. Producers pay a smaller fraction of the tax on services.