Ch 5: Income protection insurance Flashcards
Discuss the customer needs met by income protection products
Main needs (8)
Perceived needs (5)
Other needs (3)
Other general needs (5)
-
Main needs
- Income replacement
- peace of mind (income stream while unable to earn)
- if state sickness/disability income insufficient
- employment benefits short term (employer continues to pay employee’s income)
- Match loan servicing costs
- protection against inability to meet major financial loans
- required by lender
- may cover unemployment
- Income replacement
-
Perceived needs
- protect ill-health uncertainty
- minimise risk of disruption to financial wellbeing esp with dependents
- treatment bills unknown (disability/sickness often unknown)
- value financial comfort
-
Other needs
- fund other insurance premiums
- premium waiver
- IP on professionals in practice
-
Other general needs
-
clear purpose
- in risks covered/benefits payable
- easily understood, with unclear interpretations in clear favour of claimant
- appropriate charging structure e.g. addition of options/guarantees
- reasonable premiums
-
clear purpose
List the key features of an IP contract
(8 main points, 11 subpoints)
-
Replaces income
- would’ve earned if becomes unable to work due to accident/illness
- from temporary annuity continuing until insured recovers/dies/annuity term ends, whichever comes first
- May be commutable (to provide lump sum/ not generally the case)
-
Circumstances clearly defined for benefits to become payable/cease
- Not covered
- unemployment, redundancy, early retirement, reluctance to return to work, some illnesses/physical injury e.g. HIV, attempted suicide
- Not covered
-
Benefits do not cease on claim
- cover still provided if recover and return to work
-
Level/increasing premiums/benefits
- may be at fixed rate relative to sum assured
- No surrender/maturity value
- sum at risk is very large compared to regular premium.
- once expenses/expected claims taken into account, little surplus left to build asset share
- Own/similar occupations
-
With profits/unit linked
- mostly without profits basis, no benefit paid if claim is not made
- bonus builds up death/expiry benefit, so bonus doesn’t affect IP claims
- unit linked policies may have a morbidity charge deducted from fund, with remaining unit fund at end of policy term paid as maturity benefit
What are some key requirements regarding policy conditions on IP contracts?
(3 key points, 6 subpoints)
- Must reflect true intentions of product
- Some cushion over events for which insurer has no control
-
Simple and unambiguous
- ensures important risks transferred to insurer
- clear what info required
- accurate underwriting
- rapid underwriting process
- ensure low claim rejections
- reduce non qualifying claims
What kind of product variations are possible on IP contracts?
- Guaranteed/renewable premium rates
-
full guarantee for full term of policy, expressed as level increasing/increasing according to specific index
Disadvantages of Guaranteed Premiums:- requires substantial loadings (very long contracts, maybe high standard error for claims experience)
- higher reserves
-
no guarantee
Advantages of Reviewable Premiums:- annual review
- comfort knowing premiums can be adjusted due to bad experience
- changes in workplace
- difficult at outset
- changes in diseases and medical advancements change the associated risks
- sickness that would’ve caused death, can now impair lives, leading to claims
- terminal illnesses no longer terminal
- changes in diseases and medical advancements change the associated risks
-
full guarantee for full term of policy, expressed as level increasing/increasing according to specific index
- Disadvantages of Reviewable Premiums
* market pressures may limit premium increases
* selective lapsing, leading to portfolio with only poor lives left
* PRE: careful not to create expectations of no increases
* maximum increases
* uncertain future premium amounts-
some guarantee
- e.g guaranteed for first five years, with complete freedom review after
-
some guarantee
- Guaranteed insurability option - the policyholder is able to increases the sum assured at the offices standard rates when a particular life event occurs, without supplying further medical evidence
- No claims discount - a discounted premium if no IP claim has been made
What options may we find with respect to benefits/premiums on IP contracts in terms of escalation? (8)
- May be subject to a cap
- Index or fixed rate
- escalation rate < earnings inflation
- difficult to match too high escalation rate
- Escalation rates might be different in and out of claim (can lead to complex product design)
- Premiums increase
- same rate as benefit (premium assumptions prevailing when original contract effected)
- required for additional cover at given age (protect against adverse experience)
What are some important points to bear in mind when setting claims definitions for IP contracts? (4)
-
Claim definitions
- need to strike a balance btwn meeting needs/controlling insurance risk
- can be difficult to assess incapacity, ADLs are objective
- should be allowance for interpretation
- price charged for contract may differ for different risks represented
What kind of claims definitions do we have for IP contracts?
(1,6)
(1,7)
-
Occupational based
- inability to perform own occupation (very expensive/greatest level of cover)
- inability to perform own/reasonable occupation
- by education, status, training
- own occupation initially thereafter
- inability to perform any occupation
- offered where occupations carry above average accident/health risk
- Alternative incapacity criteria
- assessing impact of illness on insured’es ability to perform tasks required by an occupation or day-to-day life
- activities of daily living
- physical activity (feeding, dressing, washing, toileting, mobility, transfer)
- mental capacity (overrides tests of physical incapacity
- functional assessment tests
- activities of daily working
- personal capability assessment
- activities of daily living
What kind of benefit definitions might exist for IP contracts?
(5 points, 16 subpoints)
1 other important overall point
-
Replacement ratio (level of post-claim income to pre-claim income, net of taxes in both cases)
- easy to calculate
- tax impacts ratio (some regions do/don’t tax benefits)
- level indicates claim experience
- higher/lower => might dissentivise/incentivise return to work
- limits
- ensure individuals have incentive to return to work
-
Maximum benefit specified
- in terms of salary at claim time
- in terms of state benefits
- Benefits expressed as cash amount (requires annual review to check needs met)
- Benefits in form of premium waivers
- waived when benefits are payable
- charged for by a small percentage addition to premium rate
-
Proportionate/rehabilitation benefits
- for those returning to work on part time basis/less strenuous/lower paid role
- benefits both insured/insurer
- recuperation needs (attractive to policyholders, doesn’t add sign cost)
- benefit relates to ratio (that gross earnings from new role bear to those from occupation against which disability was being claimed
- Benefit definitions mustn’t disincentivise insured returning to work
What is over-insurance in the context of IP contracts (1), and how might it arise? (5)
- When benefit is more than is needed e.g. a higher than appropriate replacement ratio
- Arises
- from outset
- subsequent to sale (salary not keeping up if benefits increase automatically on policy anniversary)
- reduction in tax on IP claims
- multiple policies
- non-disclosed income
How do we address over insurance in the context of IP contracts? (5)
- Addressed
- appropriate maximum benefit
- max replacement ratio
- stringent limitations for salaries in excess of limits
- overall max benefit level
- deductions for other benefits
- regular reviews to ensure that the level of benefit remains appropriate
- clear policy conditions highlighting likely action at claims stage
- financial underwriting
- appropriate maximum benefit
Other policy definitions on IP contracts:
- Waiting period (3)
*
- Watiing period
- specified period after policy start during which benefits won’t be paid
- may also apply to additional cover sought
- reduce potential for anti-selection
Other policy definitions on IP contracts in terms of timing:
- Deferred period definition and characteristics (3)
- Deferred period benefits (5)
- Deferred period
- at the start of each period of incapacity/sickness during which insurer won’t pay benefits
- split deferred period: eg pay half over for certain amount of weeks, full amount after
- early notification (even before deferred period end so insurer can help with rehabilitation)
- Deferred period benefits
- integrate with employer-supplied benefits
- reduce claim cost –> reduces premiums
- reduce administration cost
- reduce number of trivial claims
- meet customer needs: eg won’t want to claim for few days off for flu!
Other policy definitions on IP contracts in terms of timing:
Linked claims period (2)
- Linked claims period
- to waive deferred period if the same sickness recurs within certain amount of time e.g. 26, or 52 weeks
- encourage work return
Other policy definitions on IP contracts in terms of timing:
- Expiry age/term (3)
- Expiry age/term
- age at which benefits cease; often same as normal retirement age
- exact duration
- shorter premium paying period
Briefly discuss group IP contracts
General (8)
- General
- legal obligation eg some countries sick pay during first 2 weeks if sick
- discretionary benefits (after statutory period, together with illhealth income)
- employer may just administer the scheme
- net pay schemes are offered sometimes (claimant can receive up to 90% of net pre-disability income)
- cheaper (economies of scale)
- continuation option for employees after they leave
- cover employer’s statutory sick pay payments
- promote health (and ensure speedy return to work following operation)