Ch 4 Statistics Flashcards

1
Q

distribution of replicate measurements formula

A

y = (e^(-(x-µ)^2) / (2sigma^2) / (sigma √(2π))

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
1
Q

distribution of replicate measurements formula

general + z distribution ones

A

y = [e^(-(x-µ)^2) / 2sigma^2] / [(sigma√(2π))]
µ: population mean
sigma: population SD

y = [e^-z^2 / 2] / [sigma√(2π)]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

small vs large SD precision vs accuracy

A

small SD: precise, not a measure of accuracy
large SD: not precise, not a measure of accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

z vs t distribution

A

z: when sigma is known
- taller and smaller tails
- as df goes to infinity

t: when sigma is unknown
- shorter and longer tails
- specified df

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

z value formula

A

zi = (xi - µ) / sigma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

z distribution % of values between 1, 2, 3 SD from mean

A

1 SD: 68%
2 SD: 95%
3 SD: 99.7%

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

if random is the only error, 95% of measurements should fall between how many SD

A

-1.96 sigma & +1.96 sigma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

confidence interval vs confidence value

A

CI: high + low values (like interval notation)
CV: the error (the ± value)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

confidence interval formula

A

CI value = value ± z sigma(value) / √n

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

t value formula

A

ti = (xi - µ) / s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

when to use 3 t calc formulas
1. observed - expected
2. x bar 1 - x bar 2, s pooled
3. d bar

A
  1. compare expected value to observed value (ex. mud at crime scene vs amount to be guilty)
  2. compare 2 observed means (ex. water contaminants in two parts of river)
  3. compare paired data (ex. drug test and multiple athletes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

t calc > t table
t calc < t table

A

calc > table: significantly different; reject H0; random error can’t explain difference
calc < table: not significantly different; accept H0; random error can explain difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

alternative vs null hypothesis

A

alternative: try to prove (has an effect); in tails of t distribution
null: try to disprove (doesn’t have an effect); in large bump of t distribution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

small sample t test formula

A

t = [x bar - µ0] / [s/√N]

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Q test for outliers formula + interpretation of value

A

Q = |questionable results - nearest neighbor| / range

Q calc > Q critical: reject value; it’s an outlier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Grubbs test for outliers formula + interpretation of value

A

G = |questionable results - mean| / s

G calc > G critical: reject value; it’s an outlier

15
Q

F test use

A

-compare variances (SD) of 2 datasets
-measures precision
-H0: 2 variances are equal
-helps determine if one method has less error than the other

16
Q

F test formula + interpretation of value

A

F = s1^2 / s2^2
larger s in numerator

F calc > F critical: s1 significant different from s2

17
Q

type 1 vs type 2 errors

A

type 1: false positive; null H true, but we rejected it
type 2: false negative; null H false, but we accepted it