Ch 4 Preferred Risk Underwriting Flashcards
preferred risk
individuals demonstrating lower mortality risk features
CAD risk factors (8)
- age
- sex
- blood pressure
- cholesterol
- HDL
- diabetes
- LVH, left ventricular hypertrophy
- smoking status
Framingham study - 1948
study to help understand modifiable risk factors of coronary artery disease and help reduce risk of dying
used exam, med hx, physical measurements, h/w, bp, resting EKG, chest x-ray, blood chemistries
year preferred products enter industry
late 1980s, early 1990s
tobacco distinct pricing in early 1980s
divides standard into 2 classes: smokers and non-smokers. preferred risk divides standard risk class
residual standard
remaining standard risk that do not qualify for any of the preferred classes. mortality of residual higher than original standard class
Conservation of Deaths
there is a range of mortality contained inside the standard class, defined as 100%, if subset of those risks w/ lower mortality expectation are identified and offered a lower-priced rate class, then those remaining in standard class will exhibit higher mortality.
-fewer that qualify for preferred, greater the mortality discount
-after discount is determined for preferred, simple algebra calculates mortality for remaining insureds
normal distribution
models assume mortality in standard class is bell shaped, most insureds exhibit mortality close to average, few are very low or very high w/in class
-mortality does not follow normal distribution but works as approximation
to create preferred
standard subdivided into unique subsets reflecting individualized mortality assumptions associated w/ UW rules for each unique subset.
-if subdivided into 3 risk classes, mortality by class calculated as weighted average of all insureds w/in each of 3 risk classes
-pricing assumption is average mortality associated w/ specific risk class
reasons for overlap between risk classes
- unmeasured risk factors above and beyond preferred rules that impact mortality
- companies employ knock-out system that does not definitively stratify risk
Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard Model
- risk is multifactorial, multiple variables (risk factors)
- goal to parse out influence of each risk factor according to its independent contribution to risk
- AX + BY + C*Z = D
- allows researchers to investigate mortality for medical condition or procedure
- A/B/C variables solved for
- X/Y/Z variables have results for (known values)
predictor variables (independent variables)
use to predict who will develop heart disease
-build/bp/cholesterol etc
target variable (dependent variable)
result depends on predictor variable
ex. heart disease or mortality
hazard ratios
-baseline is 1.0 similar to 100% mortality or 0 debits
-1 unit increase = 1.25 HR or 125%, mortality risk increases by 25%
-ratio is multiplied instead of added like debits
point system
suggest individual’s risk can be defined by sum of debits and credits associated w/ risk factors
-positive numbers represent increased risk, negative numbers represent decreased risk
-lower points is more favorable
-takes favorable/unfavorable into account w/o allowing 1 factor to overwhelm decision by itself
knock-out system
criteria established as series of rules associated w/ each factor, PI either qualifies for risk class or is knocked out based on rule
-favorable factors cannot offset 1 unfavorable, unlike point system
-some create stretch criteria, secondary set of guidelines, to allow some insureds to move to better risk based on secondary considerations
stricter criteria equals?
lower mortality assumptions
predictors of mortality/baseline mortality features
age, gender, smoking status
Mortality Markers
- age, gender, smoking status
- bp - below 140/90, lowest risk 115/75, risk doubles for every 20/10 increase
- cholesterol - less than 200
- HDL - chol/hdl ratio, lower ratio, lower risk
- diabetes & LVH on resting EKG
- build - overwhelming impact on mortality. as weight increases, mortality increases along J curve
Addl Mortality Markets
- Accidental Death Risk
- Driving: DUI/speeding
- Hazardous avocations: flying, scuba diving, racing, mountain climbing, sky diving, parasailing, extreme sports
- Occupations
- Criminal Hx - Drugs/Alcohol: exclude hx of abuse w/in 5-10 yrs
- Personal Med hx: could cause extra mortality to warrant exclusion
- Family Med hx: CAD/diabetes/stroke/kidney disease/cancer
- Treatment: ex. tx of HBP
indirect correlation
lower education levels associated w/ higher smoking. correlates education w/ smoking. smokers have higher mortality. correlation of education and smoking is indirect
for data to be actionable?
needs to adhere to Fair Credit (FCRA). data must be disclosable, disputable and correctable
continuum of risk
core component of UW
continuous sequence in which adjacent elements are not perceptibly different from each other, although extremes are quite distinct
ex. risk associated w/ bp: heart disease can be present w/ low bp levels
-preferred pricing predicated on fact no difference in mortality, a continuum of risk, found inside standard class
predictive analytics
practice of extracting info from existing data sets in order to determine patterns and predict future outcomes and trends
advantages to preferred
-reward healthy individuals w/ lower premiums
-compete effectively by applying lower-priced products to healthier risks
-driven by competition