Ch 4: Life ins prods - Bases, unit linked Flashcards
Summary Card
- Product bases
- Unit-linked products
- Without-profits products
- Range of products
- Index-linked contracts
Describe 4 bases on which life insurance products can be written
- Conventional without profits
- guaranteed benefits, usually level regular premiums
- With-profits
- conventional/accumulating
- policyholder shares in part/all of future surplus (from within contracts, or other contracts)
- Unit-linked
- benefits linked directly to performance of specified fund, characterised by fewer gaurantees on benefits/premiums
- greater flexibility
- can be used for savings and protection
- Index-linked
- benefits guaranteed to move in line with performance of specified investment index/econimic index
Outline the key features of unit-linked contracts (8)
- Policyholders’s premiums paid into investment fund, buys units
- Value of unit fund depends on value of assets underlying investment fund, equal to units x UP
- Used for savings and protection
- Initial expenses
- can be catered for by low allocation rate at start
- moderately reduced allocation rate
- capital units (attract higher charge) vs accumulation units
- Insurer deducts charges from policyholder’s unit fund
- from premium before invested
- allocation rate, bid-offer spread, fixed amt per premium
- from unit funds
- fund management charge, fixed regular fund charge, regular charges taken to cover death benfts excess of FV
- from premium before invested
- Maturity value usually equal value of units
- Death benefit may exceed FV of unit fund.
- Surrender value is FV of unit fund, possibly with surrender penalty.
For each of the following products, suggest most likely product basis:
- term assurance
- whole life assurance
- endowment assurance
- immediate annuity
- Term assurance
- conventional without profits
- Whole life assurance
- unit-linked, or with-profits
- new conventional without-profits is rare
- Endowment assurance
- unit-linked or with-profits
- new conventional without-profits is rare
- Immediate annuity
- conventional without-profits or index-linked
Compare conventional without-profits, with-profits and unit-linked products form the consumer’s point of view in terms of cost, flexibility and guarantees
- Conventional without-profits
- high guarantees imply higher cost
- usually least flexible (to alter premiums/benefits)
- With-profits
- typically lies somewhere between other two in terms of cost, guarantees and flexibility
- Unit-linked
- higher/lower expected benefit/premium for given premium/benefit
- flexibility in types of levels of cover included, ability to vary premiums according to need
State 3 main charging structures used to meet initial expenses for unit-linked policies
- Very low, or zero, initial allocation rate
- Reduced allocation rate for significant part of term policy
- Higher regular fund management charge
Describe risks faced by an insurer which sells unit-linked contracts (9)
- Less guarantees => likely lower risk than non-linked contracts
- Nature/extent of risks influenced by
- nature/level of any guarantees,
- any marketing/legislative contraints on charges
- Anti-selection risk as for comparable non-linked products
- Selective withdrawal risk may be higher due to transparency of fees
- Withdrawal/persistency risk depends on
- asset share compared to withdrawal benefit
- which may not be guaranteed in amount, but its method of calculation
- Investment risk influence by non-unit related guarantees
- Expense risk
- less if charges are reveiwable, legislative restrictions on this
- Mortality risk depends on
- gaurantees given,
- competition: selective withdrawals leaving worse lives
- Significant marketing risk (due to low level of guarantees)
Describe index linked contracts (4)
- Benefits are guaranteed to move in line with economic performance of investment/economic index in specified contract
- Single or regular premiums
- Surrender value, if applicable, would normally be value of benefits calculated according to index value at time of surrender
- Main risk to insurer, peculiar to these contracts, relates to investment, i.e.
- being unable to invest in a way to precisely match the benefit guarantee (i.e. assets held don’t move in line with economic/investment index)
Describe risks of conventional without-profits contrats from the policyholders’ point of view (5)
- Insuffient benefit…
- ..made worse by inflation over time
- Insurer insolvency, unable to fully meet guaranteed benefits.
- Inflexibility of product to keep pace with
- changing disposable income of policyholder
- changing amounts of benefit needed throughout financial life
- Unaffordability of premiums
- accident
- sickness
- redundancy
- other loss of income
Describe risks of with-profits contracts from the policyholders’ point of view (4)
- Insufficient cover
- policyholder reduces guaranteed cover, expecting future bonuses
- investment peformance worse than expected=> lower bonuses
- Insurer insolvency
- less than under conventional business <= future surpluses can be used to maintain solvency before being distributed
- Inflexibility
- changing disposable income of policyholder
- changing amounts of benefit needed throughout financial life
- Unaffordability
- accident
- sickness
- redundancy
- other loss of income
Describe risks of unit-linked contracts from the policyholders’ point of view (4)
- Investment risk
- Long term poor performance (in terms of the average annual return over time)
- Value low on benefit payment (short term volatility)
- Insufficient cover
- Guaranteed death benefit likely to be in monetary terms
- Influenced by inflation
- Guaranteed death benefit likely to be in monetary terms
- Insurer insolvency
- Additional underwriting to increase guarantee
Describe risks of index-linked contracts from the policyholders’ point of view (3)
- Investment risk
- similar to unit linked (long term poor returns; short term volatility)
- except that they depend on performance of index rather than that of a specifically designated asset
- Insurer insolvency
- greater risk as insurer takes on investment risk (not policyholder)
- less scope for reviewing charges for existing index-linked products, potentially increases insolvency risk
- Inflexible
- prems not keeping up with changes in disposable income
- benefits not keeping up with changes in life cycle