Ch. 4 Court Cases Flashcards

1
Q

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

A

established judicial review; John Marshall power of the supreme court; “midnight judges”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

A

established national supremacy and implied powers; use of elastic clause; state unable to tax fed. institution; “power to tax&raquo_space; power to destroy”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Gibbons v Ogden (1824)

A

Supreme Court gave wide defn. to Congress’ power to “regulate commerce… among the several states”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Dred Scott v Sandford (1857)

A

upheld property rights over human rights; divided nation; rule Missouri Compromise (1820) unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Plessy v Ferguson (1896)

A

established separate but equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Schenck v US (1919)

A

limits on speech; clear and present danger test; Oliver Wendell Holmes; shouting “fire” in crowded theater

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Gitlow v. New York (1925)

A

established precedent of federalizing Bill oF RIghts; states cannot deny freedom of speech (protected in due process clause of Amend. 14)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Powell v Alabama (1932)

A

sup. ct. ruled that right to counsel is required by law in death penalty trials

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Palko v Connecticut (1937)

A

provided test to determine which parts of BoR should be federalized– which parts are explicitly necessary for liberty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Brown v Board 1st (1954)

A

school segregation unconstitutional; segregation psychologically damaging; overtunred separate but equal; used 14th amend; Warren Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Brown v Board 2nd (1955)

A

ordered schools to desegregate “with all due and deliberate speed”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

NAACP v Alabama (1958)

A

protected freedom of association/assembly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Mapp v Ohio (1961)

A

established exclusionary rule; illegally obtained evidence cannot be used in court; Warren Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Engel v Vitale (1962)

A

prohibited state sponsored recitation of prayer in public schools (est. clause & Amend. 14 due process clause); Warren Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Baker v Carr (1962)

A

“one man, one vote”; ordered state legislative districts to be as near equal in population; Warren Court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Abbington v Schempp (1963)

A

prohibited devotional Bible reading in public schools (est. clause & Amend. 14 due process clause); warren court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Gideon v Wainright (1963)

A

ordered states to provide lawyers for those unable to afford so; warren court

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Wesberry v Sanders (1963)

A

ordered house districts to be as near equal in population as possible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Heart of Atlanta Motel Inc. v US (1964)

A

court ruled congress could outlaw racial segregation of private facilities that are engaged in interstate commerce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Griswald v Connecticut (1965)

A

established right of privacy via 4th and 9th amend.; set precedent for Roe v Wade

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Harper v Virginia Board of Elections (1966)

A

poll taxes make illegal for state elections bc violated equal protection clause (amend 14)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Miranda v Arizona (1966)

A

es. miranda warnings of counsel and silence; warren court

23
Q

In Re Gault (1967)

A

children granted some of the rights in criminal cases protected by BoR

24
Q

Epperson v Arkansas (1968)

A

prohibited states form banning teaching of evolution

25
Q

Tinker v Des Moines SD (1969)

A

upheld students 1st amend. right; students do not shed const. rights of freedom of speech or expression at schoolhouse gate; armbands in protest of Viet. War

26
Q

NYT v US (1971)

A

pentagon papers; no prior restraint on newspapers even if publication would embarrass government

27
Q

Lemon v Kurtzman (1971)

A

est. 3 part test to determine if est. clause is violated:nonsecular purpose, doesnt influence religion or entangle w/ government; funding of religious schools

28
Q

Roe v Wade (1973)

A

est. nat. abortion guidelines; trimester guidelines; inferred precedent of Griswald v Connecticut

29
Q

US v Nixon (1974)

A

allowed for executive privilege, but not in criminal cases; watergate; “even president is not above law”

30
Q

Buckley v Valeo (1976)

A

1st amend protects campaign spending; legislatures can limit contributions but NOT how much one spends of their OWN money for campiagn

31
Q

UC Regents v Bakke (1978)

A

Alan BAkke and UC Davis Medical School; strict quotas unconst. but state may allow race to be taken into account as ONE factor in admissions decisions

32
Q

NJ v TLO (1985)

A

4th and 14th amend; student accused of smoking in BR principal searches purse and finds evidence of dealing in school… reasonable search and seizure?

33
Q

Bethel SD v. Fraser (1986)

A

permits a public school to punish a student for giving a lewd speech; sexually suggestive political speech at HS assembly to elect officers

34
Q

Webster v Reproductive Health Services (1987)

A

more leeway for states in regulating abortion

35
Q

Hazelwood SD v Kuhlmeier (1988)

A

1st amend; principal removed articles of newspaper bc “inappropriate, personal, unsuitable” etc.

36
Q

Planned Parenthood v Casey (1992)

A

states can regulate abortion but not with regulations that impose “undue burden” upon women; more leeway for states in regulating abortion

37
Q

Shaw v Reno (1993)

A

no racial gerrymandering (preference); race cannot be sole/predominant factor in redrawing legislative boundaries

38
Q

US v Lopez (1995)

A

gun free school zones act exceeded congress’ authority to regulate interstate commerce

39
Q

Reno v ACLU (1997)

A

extending 1st amend. free speech to internet; court repealed parts of communications decency act of 1996

40
Q

US Term Limits, Inc. v Thornton (1997)

A

state-imposed term limits of congress-members was unconstitutional

41
Q

Clinton v NY (1998)

A

banned presidential use of line item veto (cant reject individual provisions of a bill)

42
Q

Boy Scouts of America v Dale (2000)

A

upheld right of boy scouts to exclude 🌈gays🌈(association and speech)

43
Q

Bush v Gore (2000)

A

used 14th amendment’s equal protection clause to stop Florida recount in election of 2000

44
Q

Atkins v Virginina (2002)

A

banned use of death penalty for mentally retarded

45
Q

Zelman v Simmons-Harris (2002)

A

public money can be used to send disadvantaged kids to religious schools in tuition voucher programs

46
Q

Board v Pottawatomie (2002)

A

school dsitricts can impose random drug tests on kids in extracurric. activities

47
Q

Ashcroft v ACLU (2002)

A

struck down federal ban on “virtual” child porn

48
Q

Lawrence v Texas (2003)

A

using right of privacy struck down Texas law banning sodomy

49
Q

Grutter v Bollinger (2003)

A

allowed use of race as a general factor in law school admissions at U of Mich Law School

50
Q

Gonzales v Carhart (2007)

A

upheld partial birth abortion ban act (2003)

51
Q

District of Columbia v Heller (2008)

A

upheld individual right to bear arms

52
Q

Citizens United v Federal Elections Commission (2010)

A

prohibits government from restricting independent political expenditures by corporations, associations, labor unions or individuals; direct donations to candidates still have $ caps

53
Q

gratz v billing we

A

struck down “bonus points” for race in undergrad admissions