Ch 30 Employment Discrimination Flashcards
Employment Opportunity before 1964
The United States Constitution
- The courts have interpreted these provisions to prohibit employment discrimination by federal, state, and local governments.
Civil Rights Act of 1866
-. It has been interpreted to prohibit racial discrimination in both private and public employment (except it does not apply to the federal government)
Equal Pay Act of 1963
-Under the Equal Pay Act (EPA), a worker may not be paid at a lesser rate than employees of the opposite sex for equal work.
- However, unequal pay is legal if it is the result of:
-Seniority
-Merit
-Quantity or quality of work
-Any other factor other than sex
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
-Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, it is illegal for employers with 15 or more employees to discriminate on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
- protected categories: Race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.
Prohibited Activities
(Disparate Treatment, Disparate Impact, Retaliation, )
-To prove a disparate treatment case, the plaintiff must show that she was treated less favorably than others because of her sex, race, color, religion, or national origin.
-The required steps in a disparate treatment case are:
- The plaintiff presents evidence that:
-She belongs to a protected category under Title VII,
-She suffered adverse employment action, and
-This action occurred under conditions giving rise to an inference of discrimination.
- prima facie: From the Latin, meaning “from its first appearance,” something that appears to be true upon a first look.
- -The defendant must present evidence that its decision was based on legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons.
- -To win, the plaintiff must now prove that the employer intentionally discriminated, although this motive can be inferred from differences in treatment.
=She may prove her case by showing either that
1.the reasons the employer offered were simply a pretext or
2.that a discriminatory intent is more likely than not.
[Disparate Impact]
-Disparate impact applies if the employer has a rule that, on its face,is not discriminatory, but in practice excludes too many people in a protected category.
-The required steps in a disparate impact case are:
[Hostile Work Environment]
-Employers violate Title VII if they permit a work environment that is so hostile toward people in a protected category that it affects their ability to work.
(Sexual Harassment.)
-. There are two categories of sexual harassment:
* Quid pro quo: A Latin phrase that means, “one thing in return for another.”
* Hostile work environment
(Same-Sex Harassment.)
(#MeToo.)
=The #MeToo movement brought social media attention to sexual harassment and assault in the workplace, particularly in the entertainment industry. In response, some states passed laws that prohibit
1.nondisclosure provisions in settlement agreements involving sexual misdeeds and
2.nondisparagement rules that prohibit employees from criticizing their workplace.
behavior violates Title VII:
-Would you say or do this in front of your spouse or parents?
-What about in front of a colleague of the opposite sex?
-Would you like your behavior reported in your local newspaper?
-Does it need to be said or done at all?
(Hostile Environment Based on Race.)
(Hostile Environment Based on Color.)
(Hostile Environment Based on National Origin.)
(Employer Liability for Harassment.)
The Supreme Court has held
=The company is liable if it knew or should have known about the conduct and failed to stop it.
=Even if the company was unaware of the misbehavior, it is nonetheless liable if the victimized employee suffered a “tangible employment action” such as firing, demotion, or reassignment.
=If the company was unaware of the behavior and the victimized employee did not suffer a tangible employment action, the company is still liable unless it can prove that
1.it used reasonable care to prevent and correct harassing behavior and
2.the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of the complaint procedure or other preventive opportunities provided by the company.
[Retaliation]
-Title VII also prohibits employers from retaliating against workers who oppose discrimination, bring a claim under the statute, or take part in an investigation or hearing. A defendant can defeat a retaliation claim by showing that there were other, nondiscriminatory reasons for his action.
Religion
-Employers cannot discriminate against a worker because of his religious beliefs. In addition, employers must make reasonable accommodation for a worker’s religious practices unless the request would cause undue hardship for the business.
Sex
-“gender must be irrelevant to employment decisions
-Title VII forbids sexual stereotyping
=The opinion said, “An employer who objects to aggressiveness in women but whose positions require this trait places women in an intolerable and impermissible catch-22: out of a job if they behave aggressively and out of a job if they do not. Title VII lifts women out of this bind.”
Appearance
(Sex, Attractiveness, Weight, Hair, )
[Sex]
-Employers may adopt different appearance standards for men and women, but these standards may not impose a greater burden on one sex than the other.
[Attractiveness]
-Unattractiveness is not a protected category under Title VII
[Weight]
[Hair]
Parenthood
(Pregnancy, Parental Status, Parental Leaves,)
[Pregnancy]
-The Pregnancy Discrimination Act (PDA) is an amendment to the Civil Rights Act, which prohibits employers from firing, refusing to hire, or failing to promote a woman because she is pregnant
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC): The agency charged with enforcing federal discrimination law.
[Parental Status]
-Discrimination based on parental status is a violation of Title VII if it involves treating men and women differently
Sexual Orientation and Transgender Status
The Supreme Court recently ruled that both sexual orientation and transgender status are protected categories under Title VII. Thus an employer may not consider these factors when making employment decisions
Background and Credit Checks
-EEOC regulations prohibit companies from using criminal history information in a way that has an adverse impact on employees in a protected category if the background information is irrelevant in determining whether the employee is appropriate for the job
-Employers may not consider arrest records because that is not evidence of wrongdoing. The EEOC also discourages the use of credit checks because minorities tend to have worse credit ratings than Whites.
Immigration
-Under Title VII, it is illegal for employers to discriminate against noncitizens because “national origin” is a protected category.
Reverse Discrimination
Reverse discrimination: Making an employment decision that harms a white person or a man because of his gender, color, or race
- affirmative action:Programs that remedy the effects of past discrimination.
=Affirmative action is not required by Title VII, nor is it prohibited. Affirmative action programs have three different sources:
1. Litigation.
2. Voluntary action. Employers can voluntarily introduce an affirmative action plan to remedy the effects of past practices or to achieve (but not to maintain) equitable representation of minorities and women, provided that the plan is not too unfair to majority members
3. Government contracts. The government may use affirmative action programs when awarding contracts only if
1.it can show that the programs are needed to overcome specific past discrimination,
2.they have time limits, and
3.nondiscriminatory alternatives are not available.
Defenses to Charges of Discrimination
(Merit, Seniority, Bona Fide Occupational Qualification, )
[Merit]
-A defendant is not liable if he shows that the person he favored was the most qualified
[Seniority]
-A legitimate seniority system is legal even if it perpetuates past discrimination.
[Bona Fide Occupational Qualification]
-An employer is permitted to establish discriminatory job requirements if they are essential to the position in question.
- bona fide occupational qualification (BFOQ): An employer is permitted to establish discriminatory job requirements if they are essential to the position in question.
-However, the courts recognize three situations in which employers may consider customer preference:
=Safety.
=Privacy. An employer may refuse to hire women to work in a men’s bathroom, and vice versa
=Authenticity. An employer may refuse to hire a man for a woman’s role in a movie. In addition, a court ruled that Disney could fire an Asian man from the Norwegian exhibit at its Epcot international theme park, not because he was Asian,