Ch 3- Risk Assessment-HI and DE Assessment Flashcards

1
Q

Forerunners prior to FORMAL risk assessment

A

1) 1970s plan of Congress to protect human and environmental health
2) ACGIH -TLVs
3) FDAs- ADI/ TDI, Delaney Clause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Where is risk assessment defined?

A

In 1983

In the Red Book “ Risk Assessment in the Federal Government: Managing the Process (Red Book)

Four Basic framework steps (HI, DE assessment, Exposure Assessment, Risk charac)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Whats did the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) 1994 report
entitled ‘Science and Judgment in Risk Assessment’ emphasize?

A
  1. Use a combination of combination of qualitative and quantitative approaches
  2. How to deal with uncertainities and data gaps
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What was the answer to deal with challenges in RA ?

A

Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Risk Management (Risk Commission, 1997)

SUGGESTED:

  1. the framework for RISK MANAGEMENT (6 steps)
  2. engage stakeholders
  3. do away with single-chemical, single- exposureapproach
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Whats is a major challenge for A major challenge for risk assessment, risk communication, and risk management?

A

Show biological plausibility and clinical significance of concludions from Epi studies

Use:

  • Biomarkers of exposure
  • Biomarkers of effect
  • Differences in indi susceptability
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How is toxicity of closely related chemicals in mixtures evaluated (eg: TCDD with other related chlorinated and brominated dioxins, dibenzofurans etc) ?

A

using toxicity equivalence factors (TEFs)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a formula to calculate toxicity in mixutres?

A

[conc. of chemcial 1 * TEF] +

[conc. of chemical 2 *TEF] +

[conc. of chemical 3 *TEF]

.

.

.

etc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Where has there been renewed interest to use SARs to predict toxcity?

A

nanomaterials (due st the size of the # of cmpds.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What info can short term assays and in vitro assays provide to risk assessment?

A

MOA

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Whats is the advantage of lifetime todent bioassays for HI?

A
  1. Provide additional mechanistic data
  2. look for non-cancer enpoints

(integrate it with data from short term assays, epi studies)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The cancer bioassay, originally designed for hazard identification, is frequently used to evaluate dose–response. But what are the shortcomings?

A
  • Use of few animals
  • USe of very high odses ( for extrapolation of low-dose response)
  • high doses may saturate important metabolism and elimination pathways

This has LIMITED the use of cancer bioassays for human cancer risk prediction

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Whats are +ve indicators of carcinogenicity of a chemical in rodent carcinogenicity assays?

A

Increase in tumor multiplicity

induction of rare tumors

shorter latency period

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

reactions between nucleophilic toxicants and electrophiles is rare but DOES occur in whihc case?

A
Reaction of _amines and hydrazides_ with the
_aldehyde pyridoxal_ (a cosubstrate for several enzymes)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly