Ch 2 Syntax and Semantics Of Propositional Logic Flashcards
By enclosing an expression in quotation marks once can…
talk about that expression
Quotation makes allow one to designate, that is, to refer to single expressions.
If * and # are English sentences then..
‘* and #’ is an English sentence
Greek letters used for * and # are metavariables it metalinguistic variables
What is a sentence letter in L1
P,Q,R,P1 ect are sentence letters
What is a sentence of L1
All sentence letters are sentences of L1
All the rules combining sentence letters are L1
Nothing else is a sentence of L1
What are connectives?
The 5 symbols Conjunction Disjunction Negation Arrow DoubleArriw
What is Bracketing convention 1?
The outer brackets may be omitted from a sentence that is not part of another sentence
What is bracketing convention 2?
The inner set of brackets may be omitted from a sentence in the form ((P^R)^Q) and analogous convention applied to v
This could be abbreviated to (P^R^Q)
Which logical operations bind stronger than others?
^ and v bind more strongly than arrow or double arrow
What is the sentence P Q^R an abbreviation of?
Since ^ binds more strongly than , ^ gains the upper hand and (P (Q^R)) is the correct reading
What is Bracketing convention 3?
P,Q,R are sentences of L1
* is either ^ or v and # is either -> or
Then if (P#(QR) or ((PQ)#R) occurs as part of the sentence that is to be abbreviated, the inner set of brackets may be omitted.
The L1 sentence P -> Q is false iff
P is true and Q is false, otherwise it is true
Instead of saying that a sentence is true, logicians say that
the sentence has the truth-value True
What is an L1 structure?
An assignment of exactly one truth-value (T or F) to every sentence letter of L1
Truth in an L1 structure
Let A be some L1-structure. Then |…|A assigns either T or F to every sentence of L1 in the following way
If P is a sentence letter, |P|A is the truth value assigned to P by the L1-Structure A
The main column
Is the column with the truth value of the entire sentence
A sentence # of L1 is logically true if and only if
is true is all L1-structures
Any sentence # of L1 is a contradiction iff
is not true in any L1 structure
A sentence # and a sentence * are logically equivalent iff
and * are true in exactly the same L1 structures
The logically true sentence of L1 are also called
Tautologies
Let ¥ be a set of sentences in L1 and # a sentence of L1. The argument with all sentences in ¥ as premises and # as conclusion is valid iff
There is no L1 structure in which all sentences in ¥ are true and # is false
Thus an L1-argument is not valid iff there is a structure that makes all premisses true and the conclusion false
An L1 structure is a counterexample to the argument with ¥ as the set of premisses and # as conclusion iff |$|A = T for all $€¥ and |#|A = F
There fore an argument in L1 is valid iff it does not have a counterexample
What is the definition for semantic consistency?
A set ¥ of of L1-sentences is semantically consistent iff there is an L1 structure A such that |¥|A =T for all sentence # of ¥. Semantic inconsistency is just the opposite of semantic consistency: a set ¥ of L1-sentences is semantically inconsistent iff ¥ is not consistent
If # and all elements of ¥ are L1-sentences, then the following obtains:
¥ |= # iff the set containing all sentences in ¥ and -# is semantically inconsistent