Ch 2 Syntax and Semantics Of Propositional Logic Flashcards

1
Q

By enclosing an expression in quotation marks once can…

A

talk about that expression

Quotation makes allow one to designate, that is, to refer to single expressions.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

If * and # are English sentences then..

A

‘* and #’ is an English sentence

Greek letters used for * and # are metavariables it metalinguistic variables

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is a sentence letter in L1

A

P,Q,R,P1 ect are sentence letters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a sentence of L1

A

All sentence letters are sentences of L1

All the rules combining sentence letters are L1

Nothing else is a sentence of L1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are connectives?

A
The 5 symbols
Conjunction 
Disjunction
Negation
Arrow
DoubleArriw
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is Bracketing convention 1?

A

The outer brackets may be omitted from a sentence that is not part of another sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is bracketing convention 2?

A

The inner set of brackets may be omitted from a sentence in the form ((P^R)^Q) and analogous convention applied to v

This could be abbreviated to (P^R^Q)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Which logical operations bind stronger than others?

A

^ and v bind more strongly than arrow or double arrow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the sentence P Q^R an abbreviation of?

A

Since ^ binds more strongly than , ^ gains the upper hand and (P (Q^R)) is the correct reading

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is Bracketing convention 3?

A

P,Q,R are sentences of L1
* is either ^ or v and # is either -> or

Then if (P#(QR) or ((PQ)#R) occurs as part of the sentence that is to be abbreviated, the inner set of brackets may be omitted.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

The L1 sentence P -> Q is false iff

A

P is true and Q is false, otherwise it is true

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Instead of saying that a sentence is true, logicians say that

A

the sentence has the truth-value True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What is an L1 structure?

A

An assignment of exactly one truth-value (T or F) to every sentence letter of L1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Truth in an L1 structure

Let A be some L1-structure. Then |…|A assigns either T or F to every sentence of L1 in the following way

A

If P is a sentence letter, |P|A is the truth value assigned to P by the L1-Structure A

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

The main column

A

Is the column with the truth value of the entire sentence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

A sentence # of L1 is logically true if and only if

A

is true is all L1-structures

17
Q

Any sentence # of L1 is a contradiction iff

A

is not true in any L1 structure

18
Q

A sentence # and a sentence * are logically equivalent iff

A

and * are true in exactly the same L1 structures

19
Q

The logically true sentence of L1 are also called

A

Tautologies

20
Q

Let ¥ be a set of sentences in L1 and # a sentence of L1. The argument with all sentences in ¥ as premises and # as conclusion is valid iff

A

There is no L1 structure in which all sentences in ¥ are true and # is false

Thus an L1-argument is not valid iff there is a structure that makes all premisses true and the conclusion false

21
Q

An L1 structure is a counterexample to the argument with ¥ as the set of premisses and # as conclusion iff |$|A = T for all $€¥ and |#|A = F

A

There fore an argument in L1 is valid iff it does not have a counterexample

22
Q

What is the definition for semantic consistency?

A

A set ¥ of of L1-sentences is semantically consistent iff there is an L1 structure A such that |¥|A =T for all sentence # of ¥. Semantic inconsistency is just the opposite of semantic consistency: a set ¥ of L1-sentences is semantically inconsistent iff ¥ is not consistent

23
Q

If # and all elements of ¥ are L1-sentences, then the following obtains:

A

¥ |= # iff the set containing all sentences in ¥ and -# is semantically inconsistent