Ch 2: How Psychologists Do Research Flashcards
Theory
An organized system of assumptions and principles that purports to explain a specified set of phenomena and their interrelationships
Hypothesis
A statement that attempts to predict or to account for a set of phenomena; scientific hypotheses specify relationships among events or variables and are empirically tested
Operational definition
A precise definition of a term in a hypothesis, which specifies the operations for observing and measuring the process or phenomenon being defined
What makes psychological research scientific?
- Precision; use of theories, hypothesis, and operational definitions
- Skepticism; not just about debunking a claim, but showing why the claim is invalid
- Reliance on empirical evidence
- Willingness to make “risky predictions”; that can be refuted, apply to the principle of falsifiability
- Openness; the free flow of ideas, full disclosure of procedures used in a study
Principle of falsifiability
The principle that a scientific theory must make predictions that are specific enough to expose the theory to the possibility of disconfirmation.
Must predict not only what will happen, but what will not happen
Confirmation bias
The tendency to look for or pay attention only to information that confirms one’s own belief
Representative sample
A group of individuals, selected from a population for study, that matches the population on important characteristics such as age and sex
Descriptive methods
Methods that yield descriptions of behaviour but not necessarily causal explanations
Case study
A detailed description of a particular individual being studied or treated
Ex: Behaviour of child that was abused/neglected provides insight into developmental stages at a certain age
Pros: Provides in depth info on individuals; unusual cases can shed light on situations or problems that are unethical or impractical to study in other ways
Cons: Individual may not be representative; memories may be selective or inaccurate; if vital info is missing, then difficult to interpret findings
Observational studies
A study in which the researcher carefully and systematically observes and records behaviour without interfering with the behaviour; it may involve either naturalistic or laboratory observation
Used to describe behaviour, rather than explain why it happens.
Pros: Can see how subjects act in a normal social environment
Cons: In a lab setting it can be hard to maintain natural behaviour
Naturalistic observation
Used to find out how people or animals act in their normal social environment
Pros: Often useful in first stages of a research program
Cons: Researcher has little to no control; observations may be biased; does not identify cause and effect
Laboratory observation
Provides researchers with more control of the situation; access to equipment, control over number of people observed, etc.
Pros: Allows researcher more control; use of sophisticated equipment
Cons: Behaviour may differ from that in a natural environment; observations may be biased; does not identify cause and effect
Psychological tests
Procedures used to measure and evaluate personality traits, emotional states, aptitudes, interests, abilities, and values
Used in education, industry, and scientific research
Pros: Yields info on personality traits, emotional states, aptitudes, and abilities. Can be improvement over self-evaluation, removes distorted view of self
Cons: Difficult to construct tests that are reliable and valid
Objective tests (aka inventories)
Measure beliefs, feelings, or behaviours of which an individual is aware
Projective tests
Designed to tap unconscious feelings or motives
Standardize (tests)
In test construction, to develop uniform procedures for giving and scoring a test
Norms (tests)
In test construction, established standards of performance
Reliability (tests)
In test construction, the consistency of scores derived from a test, from one time and place to another.
When a test produces the same results from one time and place to the next, and from one scorer to another.
Validity (tests)
The ability of a test to measure what it was designed to measure
Surveys
Questionnaires and interviews that ask people directly about their experience, attitudes, or opinions
Pros: Provides a large amount of info on large numbers of people
Cons: Might be impossible to make generalizations if the sample is nonrepresentative; responses may be inaccurate or untrue; people can misinterpret questions