Ch. 2 - Court Cases

Question 0

Defendants in capital trials have the right to an attorney.

Answer 0

Powell v. Alabama

Question 1

Required that a degree on consistency in the application of the death penalty must exit

Answer 1

Furman v. Georgia

Question 2

Established the concept of judicial review by U.S. Supreme Court

Answer 2

Marbury v. Madison

Question 3

Police officers can seize items they know by experience are weapons by the “plain feel” doctrine.

Answer 3

Minnesota v. Dickerson

Question 4

Lawyers are to be provided to those who can not afford one.

Answer 4

Gideon v. Wainwright

Question 5

Defendants have the right to have an attorney present when being questioned by police.

Answer 5

Escobedo v. Illinois

Question 6

Established the immediate control” test for search and seizures.

Answer 6

Chimes v. California

Question 7

Established that school personnel can search students’ belongings as they have reasonable suspicion.

Answer 7

New Jersey v. T.L.O.

Question 8

Established that officers with a valid search warrant do not have to “knock and announce” their presence.

Answer 8

Hudson v. Michigan

Question 9

Established the concept of “reasonable suspicion” to perform a “stop and frisk”

Answer 9

Terry v. Ohio

Question 10

Outlawing out deadly force on anyone that is not confirmed to be a deadly weapon.

Answer 10

Tennessee v. Gamer

Question 11

Applied it unconstitutional to apply the death penalty to any offender under that age of 18.

Answer 11

Roper v. Simmons

Question 12

Established the exclusionary rule for federal cases

Answer 12

Weeks v. United States

Question 13

Established the a defendant must be advised of his constitutional rights prior to interrogation by police

Answer 13

Miranda v. Arizona

Question 14

Applied the exclusionary rule to state cases

Answer 14

Map v. Ohio

Question 15

Established that police cannot search without both parties

Answer 15

Georgia v. Randolph