Ch 15 - Performance Measurement (1) Flashcards
When calculating rates of return, take extra care with:
The timing and size of all cashflows
Differentiating between investment income and new money
Tax and expenses
Merits of the money-weighted rate of return
Useful as an absolute measure of the achieved return (positive)
Affected by the timing and size of cashflows (negative) - Thus, not a good basis for comparing two different fund managers
Money-weighted rate of return - may be alright to compare two different fund managers if either of the following conditions hold:
No large cashflows (relative to the funds involved) in the valuation period
No great fluctuations in market values during the period (or rate of return is stable over the period)
TWRR and MWRR are similar when:
No large cashflows (relative to the funds involved) in the valuation period
No great fluctuations in market values during the period (or rate of return is stable over the period)
Merits of time-weighted rate of return
Not affected by the size or timing of cashflows - Therefore, can use as a basis for comparing different investment managers
Does not give the rate actually achieved
Impractical (think why for short answers like this)
Practical solution is to use the linked internal rate of return as an approximation for the TWRR. Conditions needed for the approximation to be good:
Rate of return is stable over each inter-valuation period
Small cashflows between periods relative to the size of the fund
Note:
LIRR and TWRR will be exact if the valuations occur on the same date as the cashflows!
Merits of the Linked Internal Rate of Return
Practical approximation for the TWRR
Does not give the rate of return actually earned on the assets over the period
Linked Internal Rate of Return
Determine the value of the fund at various dates throughout the year (e.g. monthly or quarterly intervals)
For each inter-valuation period, calculate the MWRR
Link the inter-valuation MWRRs together to get the LIRR for the year
Two basic ways in which to compare the performance of a portfolio with an index:
Compare the actual value of the portfolio with what would have been achieved had the money been invested in the same way in an index (gives us the notional value of the fund)
Comparing the TWRR from each (or the LIRR) OR EVEN IRR
Time-weighted rate of return formula
(1+i)^T = V(t1)/V(0) * V(t2)/[V(t1)+C(t1)] …V(T)/[Vtn)+C(tn)]
Money-weighted rate of return formula
V(0)(1+i)^T + sum(C(t)(1+i)^(T-t)) = V(T)
Treynor measure
[R(p) - r]/ beta(p)
Sharpe measure
[R(p) - r] / sigma(p)
Jensen measure
R(p) - R(b)
Where R(b) = r + beta(p)[R(m) - r] (the expected return on the benchmark)
Pre-specified standard deviation
R(p) - R(b)
Where R(b) = r + [R(m)-r]/(sigma(m) * sigma(p))