Ch. 14 Flashcards
oscillating dynamics.
What is beneficial at one time point, is not at the next due to alterations in
environmental conditions over time.
coexistence can be
stable or unstable.
Stable coexistence
means that species tend to recover from low densities and that
species densities may fluctuate over time, but don’t disappear.
Equalizing Mechanisms
Reduce fitness difference between species
All species in the community respond in the same way to the environment
The more similar species are in fitness the longer it would take for competition to favor one species at the expense of another
Cannot facilitate the recovery of species from low densities
Cannot lead to stable coexistence
Unstable coexistence
means that even if species coexist for long periods of time
there are no ecological mechanisms that will promote species recovery when at
low abundance leading to species extinction and decline in species richness.
Stabilizing Mechanisms
Stable coexistence requires stabilizing mechanisms
The species similar in fitness requires less stabilizing mechanisms to maintain coexistence
Include: resource partitioning and frequency-dependent selection – because these operate whether the environment fluctuates or not
and thus are called fluctuation-independent mechanisms.
Mechanisms that depend on population densities and environmental factors are called fluctuation-dependent mechanisms.
fluctuation-dependent mechanisms.
Mechanisms that depend on population densities and environmental factors
Origins of the Idea of the Storage Effect
Discovered by Peter Chesson in the 1980’s
He was exploring a hypothesis proposed by another scientist: Peter Sale
Sale’s hypothesis stated that temporal variation in recruitment could allow the
coexistence of many species of fish competing for territories on a coral reef.
fluctuation-independent mechanisms.
resource partitioning and frequency-dependent selection – because these operate whether the environment fluctuates or not
Fluctuation-Dependent Mechanisms
Can be classified into two categories:
Nonlinearity of competition
Storage Effect
The storage effect
temporal variation in environmental conditions leads to
species coexistence
competition for territories on the reef is intense; once a territory is
obtained
it is held until the death of the individual
Sale predicted that even if fish have generalized diets and habitat usage….
as long as there is
temporal variation in the availability of territories (due to death of individuals) and variation in the
settlement of fry of different fish species on those territories, a wide diversity of species can
coexist within the coral reef habitat.
‘lottery model’
territory establishment is on a
first-come-first serve basis.
Temporal variation in recruitment, coupled with relatively long-lived adult stage
that can “store” the population contributions allows these temporal fluctuations to be
a stabilizing mechanism.
Key features of the Lottery Model (fix)
Adult fish hold territories on the reef until death. Adults are iteroparous (reproduce
more than once), and each species has overlapping generations.
- To survive and reproduce territories are necessary. Space is limiting. There are
always more fry fish attempting to establish territories than there are territories.
Allocation of territories is a first-come-first-serve basis.
Fry are produced in abundance and dispersed.
Fry survival depends on environmental conditions, which fluctuate over time, species
differ in their response to those conditions. So this means that all species have relatively
“good” and “bad” years for fry survival and territory recruitment.