Ch 1:Section 2 - Remedying Breach Flashcards

1
Q

Reliance Interest

A

Measures the worsening of the promisee’s condition or if the promisee did something relying on the promise

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Restitution Interest

A

Measures the benefit given to the promisor by the promisee

- puts the promisor back in the position before the promise was made.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Restatement 334

A

Purposes of Remedies and the Three Types of Interests

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Specific Performance

A

Compelling performance of exactly what was promised as a remedy; may not be available or may be undesired; **Rarely used or used when monetary compensation is inadequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Specific Performance

A

Compelling performance of exactly what was promised as a remedy; may not be available or may be undesired; **Rarely used or used when monetary compensation is inadequate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Efficient Breach

A

You may breach a contract if it would save you money by breaching as opposed to following through with the promise
(i.e. the lawsuit is cheaper than the actual promise)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Remedies

A

Contract damages are intended to be compensatory and NOT punitive; Damages are punitive if they put the promisor in a WORSE position than before.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

US Naval Institute V. Charter

A

** if certainty on actual damages is not possible, then a REASONABLE method of calculation is sufficient.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sullivan V. O’Connor

A
    • EXCEPTIONAL CASE**
    • Sullivan received Reliance and Restitution; which included pain and suffering
    • Expectation would have been too much (expectation nose)
    • Restitution would not have been enough (Dr fees)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

White v. Benkowski

A

Even if done maliciously, no punitive damages for breach of contract unless action is tortious

  • if P proves actual injury/inconvenience/pecuniary damages (as assessed by the trier of fact), they will get compensatory damages
  • -* Even if they cannot give exact dollar amount
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Expectation interest

A

Providing the benefit of the bargain (what did the promisee expect to gain)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Nominative Damages

A

When a plaintiff proves breach but fails to prove damages, they are traditionally awarded nominal damages of $1; symbolic win/show of rights; may also carry award of court costs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Punitive Damages

A

May be granted for tortious conduct that is sufficiently outrageous

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Restatement 355

A

Punitive damages are NOT recoverable for a breach of contract unless the conduct constituting the breach is also a tort for which punitive damages are recoverable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Remedies in Practice

A
  • Often favor the big business/RPs
  • OSs often settle early and if they do see damages, often have to pay atty fees which does NOT put them back at expectation interest
  • There are some methods to balance out the system: Class actions, statutory remedies, consumer fraud provisions
  • Alternative Dispute Resolution is in place to be faster, more efficient (cheaper); Arbitration and mediation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly