CFPs in text Citations Flashcards

1
Q

2016 intro all WR broken

A

Minix-Pardos et al., 2021

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Improve running economy up to 4%

A

Hoogkamer et al., 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Mass, cushioning and longitudinal bending stiffness affect energy cost of running.
Lighter- reduce inertia of leg swing
Cushioning- reduce knee flexion
Overall- reduce muscular effort

A

Hoogkamer et al., 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

3 elements deviate from traditional running shoe:
-embedded CFP in sole
- midsole material
-midsole thickness

A

Burns & Tam 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CFP increases longitudinal bending stiffness of shoe providing 1% improvement in RE. Runner reduces energy cost by limiting ROM of metatarsophalangeal

A

Stefanyshan & Nigg 1997
Stafanyshan & Fusco 2004

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Increasing stride length improves RE

A

Sleivert & Rowlands, 1996
Mooses et al., 2015

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Athletic shoe midsole is too compliant with much of force generated at MP joint being dissipated during running and jumping. This is countered by the CFP

A

Stefanyshan & Nigg 1997

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CFP stiffens joint and acts as lever to reduce work rate at ankle

A

Hoogkamer et al., 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Modelling study proposed 6% improvement in RE as a result of rocker effect. Being able to move the body forward further and with less of an energy cost, increases max speed for user

A

Nigg et al,. 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

PEBA foam less dense that EVA, so Vaporfly benefits from increased thickness to midsole for cushioning without any extra weight

A

Burns & Tam 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Adding mass to distal part of leg has a larger effect on metabolic cost, 0.75% decreased in RE with every 100g mass per shoe

A

Frederick et al,. 1984

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Increased mid sole thickness is proposed to reduce energy cost of running by 2.5% due to increased leg length, long and thinner legs contribute to improved moment of inertia and reduced muscular demand to move legs forward

A

Muniz-Pardos et., al 2021

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Combining improved compliance and cushioning with increased resilience of midsole will make for best running shoe with lightweight design

A

Hoogkamer et al., 2018

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Reports of ankle reversion from the shoes

A

Hunter et al., 2019

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

No longitudinal studies advocating increased risk of injury due to more rigid insoles from CFPs

A

Sun et al., 2020

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Increased stiffness can benefit performance, while thicker and softer midsole can reduce impact forces

A

Sun et al., 2020

17
Q

Plantar flexors in ankle and intrinsic muscles in foot act to store and return energy during running

A

Bramah 2020

18
Q

Reduction in size, strength and loss of tendon stiffness could negatively impact performance in long term

A

Holowka et al., 2018
Zhang et al., 2018

19
Q

4% decrease in running energy cost is possible in other ways, as observed in a study examining the effects of a 14 week strength training program on the ankle plantar-flexor muscles

A

Albracht & Arampatiz, 2013