Certainty of Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Vagueness

R v CAE Industries

A

Best efforts can be treated as binding, esp when parties treat it as such.
1) Can be made certain it should be
2) looks at objective intentions
3) did parties want contract?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Incompleteness and Agreements to Agree

May v Butcher

A

Bloody tents. Agreement to agree not binding, agreement to arbitration not binding. Price uncertain not viable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Incompleteness and Agreements to Agree

Hillas v Arcos

A

Context of industry customs can be used to save a contract form vagueries. External Metric

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Incompleteness and Agreements to Agree

Foley v Classique Coaches

A

Behavior indicating a contract (part performance etc)=contract. Contracts with mutual reliance are less likely to be stricken down. agreements to agree on price can be binding where there is a reasonable external metric.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Incompleteness and Agreements to Agree

Sale of Goods Act-Ascertainment of Price

A

Agreements to agree enforceable in BC.
if price not set then buyer pays a reasonable price.
Sending to third party also enforceable.
If third party is unable contract is avoided. partial performance negates this.
if third party is prevented by a party other party may sue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Agreements to Negotiate

Bhasin v Hrynew

A

Good faith implied in matter of law. Arises when contract is made and under performance. Obligation is to not lie.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Agreements to Negotiate

Empress v Bank of Nova Soctia

A

Implied obligation to negotiate in good faith. business efficacy.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Agreements to Negotiate

Mannpar Enterprises Ltd v Canada

A

No external metric. Dual responsiblities of the crown informed mindset in creation of contract. unenforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Anticipation to Formalization

Bawitko Investments Ltd v Kernals Popcorn Ltd

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Intention to create Legal Obligations

Balfour v Balfour

A

Some agreements between parties do not results in contracts. husband wife etc. No intention to give rise to legal consequences.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Intention to create Legal Obligations

Rose and Frank v Jr Crompton Bros

A

Commercial context will treat agreements as contracts unless explicity stated.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Intention to create Legal Obligations

TD Bank v Leigh Instruments Ltd

A

Comfort letters are not legally binding. excluding intention of the parties. In this case strategically passive.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Intention to create Legal Obligations

Canadian Taxpayers Federation v Ontario

A

Unreasonable to consider politcal promises binding. Uncertain terms, indeterminate liability

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Contacts Under Seal

Royal Bank v Kiska

A

Seal requires
1) Gummed Wafer
2) intent that it operates as a seal with a binding consideration

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Intention to Creat Legal Obligations

Family Law Act

A

Holding in Balfour v Balfour does not hold in BC when considering division of assets.
Spouse = married, or common law 2 years. includes former spouse

To be valid must be signed witnessed and written.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly