CDM - Research (importance, process) Qualitative and Quantiative Flashcards
What are the stages of the research process?
Title/ Question (can indicate if quantitative or qualitative)
Abstract (overview of whole study structure might follow going through each step of research process in brief)
Background (reviews what’s already known and shows gaps that paper is trying to answer)
Purpose/Aims (explicitly state aims- might be similar to question)
Methodology (can be one big methods section with next categories, if quantitative includes the outcomes being used and how they’re measured)
Design (explains research design)
Sampling (how sampling was carried out)
Ethics (how requirements have been met)
Data Collection (goes through how data was collected)
Data Analysis (shows how data was analysed e.g, which statistical analysis used or how themes were coded)
Findings (goes through what data analysis showed, might be shown in tables graphs etc)
Discussion (how findings relate to question)
Implications (how findings apply to nursing practice)
Conclusions (tie it all together)
Limitations (state limits of research)
What’s evidence based practise?
Combination of clinical expertise (proficiency and judgment acquired by a clinician through their experience) conscientious, explicit and judicious use of current best evidence and patients choice.
Why are all 3 components of evidence based practice needed?
- without expertise practise risks beefing tyrannised by evidence and if no evidence is available on a topic need the expertise instead
- evidence may be inapplicable or inappropriate for a patient so need their choice and experience to know if unapplicable
- research without patient focus and choice may be too generalised
- without evidence practice risks becoming dangerously out of date
- clinical expertise and evidence is another form of evidence and is often at least in part based on research but without research becomes process reliant and ideas about cause and effect or outcomes may be mistaken (unsure if outcomes are caused by an intervention used or just chance)
- non research based evidence can be easily biased and make more predictions which leads to harm being done, treatments based on process (expert opinion) may actually do more harm than good as discovered by research into outcome
- be mindful expert opinion can differ
- if based only on experience you won’t know what you don’t know as experiences only include what you’ve seen so can’t decision make by anecdote or experience alone
- have to be mindful that an expert opinion when compared with a non expert with unbiased eyes reading a a review of evidence is less likely to provide a subjective recount
Key features of primary research
- systematic approach (follows the research process)
- discovers new knowledge
- generalisable results
- to get government funding have to involve patients/public (health and social care act commitment to patient experience and measuring (quantitative) or exploring it in their own words (qualitative)
- can be quantitative (measurable outcome) or qualitative (focus on staff and patient experiences) or mixed methods (quantitative and qualitative in one paper)
Key points of secondary research
- find and use primary research
- combine number of primary research papers answering similar questions into one research study
- e.g systematic reviews, literature review, Cochrane reviews
What can research do? (8)
- categorise (create boxes to sort stuff into, can explain what things belong together and how)
- describe (observation as form of collecting data, examines situations to establish norm- what can be predicted to happen again under same circumstances)
- explain (descriptive type, deals with complex issues, move beyonds getting facts to making sense of other elements involved)
- evaluate (making judgments about quality (either as an absolute or comparatively) methods used need to relevant to context and intentions)
- compare (two or more contrasting cases to be examined to highlight differences and similarities to understand better)
- correlate (not causation!! Relationships investigated to see how they’re related to each other measures in levels of association)
- predict ( can sometimes be done in areas where correlation already known- if previous strong relationship can predict will exist again in same conditions meaning a predictable outcome)
- control (once able to understand an event may be able to control it if you know what the cause and effect relationships are and be able to exert control over vital ingredients- technology relies on ability to control)
Use of quantitative research?
Can numerically compare outcomes to see if a treatment actually does good (not harm)
Help understand cause and effect
Involves systematic empirical investigation of quantitative properties and phenomena and their relationships by asking a narrow question and collecting numerical data to analyse using statistical methods
Use of qualitative research?
- can assess quality of nursing care through patient experiences (hard to quantify experiences and interactions)
- lots of work has led to the reduction in stereotyping
- can show meaning and significance of experience of those who have a disease
- help to know about patients experiences
Involved understanding human behaviour and reasons that govern such behaviour by asking a broad question, collecting data in form of words, images and videos etc that is analysed searching for themes. (Investigate a question without attempting to quantifiably measure variables or look to potential relationships between variables)
What’s the importance of research to nursing?
- practise (improves patient care and experience nurses need to know what treatments work and what patients think- also can help reduce bias which impacts patient care shows cause and effect and people’s experiences )
- professionalism (provides scientific and distinct knowledge base for nursing knowledge , knowledge base can help ensure legal and professional standard of care is being met, code for nurses also states nurses must use evidence and stay up to date with knowledge and evidence )
- accountability (scientific justification for decisions and justifying decisions is part of meeting a duty of care, makes explicit the implicit decisions of nurses as intuition isn’t sufficient might also involve justifying why in a certain situation evidence/research/guidelines weren’t followed hard to justify decisions without evidence, especially important when things haven’t gone to plan)
- can show social relevance of nursing (the difference nursing makes through research about nursing or the fact nurses carry out research also shows nursing as a distinct profession )
What research can be used for evidence based practise?
- needs to be up to date and critically appraised
- can be primary, secondary, quantitative or qualitative research
- research can’t be looking to probe something (confirmation bias)
- needs to be unbiased
- can’t be non research based (can lead to poor predications and bias that cause harm)
- national guidelines can be evidence their strength depends on their use of research as evidence for recommendations, need to use best and most up to date information available to them (can highlight areas more research is needed)
- local guidelines can also be evidence but may be more out of date and less informed by evidence than national ones
- research is essential for guidelines
- need to evaluate the whole research paper, can’t just rely of results if you don’t know about the quality of the process etc
Role of cost in evidence based practise
- may need to appreciate cost
- decisions should never be made on cost alone
- this is often senseless and cruel and it’s right to object to this
What’s a critique?
- systematic review study of something usually involving good and bad points
- e.g critique of primary research, helpful to follow steps of research process and there are tools to do this e.g CASP (one generic tool for qualitative and multiple for quantitative depending on the method used)
What ethical approvals are needed for research?
All primary research needs ethical approval before starting
Secondary research and QI projects do not.
Primary research needs university research ethics approval
If involving NHS staff need health research authority approval
If involving NHS patients we’d health research authority NHS research ethics approval
Trust approval from their research and development (R+D team)
What are the key points of a research title/question?
- it should clearly address the gap in research
- it should focus the topic/practical problem (often from clinical practise) into an answerable question
- indication of role study will have
- can indicate if study will be quantitative or qualitative
- can show how rest of research process will be carried out and what decision will be used
What are PICO and PEO question structures?
PEO- population (and their problems), exposure (term used loosely) outcomes (or themes) often used for qualitative research.
PICO- population (affected group), intervention (what is being done for group), comparison (control group/comparison element e.g placebo, new vs current) and outcome (for quant measurable) what is hoped to achieved/changed/measured. Often used for quantitative.
What are quantitative research questions?
Systematic empirical investigation of quantitative properties and phenomena and their relationships by asking a narrow question and collecting numerical data to analyse with statistical methods
What are qualitative research questions?
Involve understanding human behaviour and the reasons that govern it by asking a broad question, collecting data in the form of words, images, video etc that is analysed searching for themes and patterns without attempting to quantifiably measure variables or look at relationships between variables.
Why is the background of a paper important?
- goes through current literature and what is already known
- shows gap paper is trying to answer (question comes from gap)
- explains why topic is important
What are the key points of sampling?
- sample must be representative of population that study is addressing
- sample needs to be representative of population
- large sample sizes are more representative of the population than high increases, repeatability, reliability and internal and external validity
- sample will always differ from the population (sampling error)
What’s probability sampling?
- everyone in population has equal chance of being sampled
- aims for representative sample
- random sampling can help achieve this
What’s non probability sampling?
- non random
- sample is chosen from population
- inferences made about the population will be weaker as are less sure the sample is representative of population so findings might not be applicable to whole population
What are the different types of random sampling?
- simple random sampling (everyone in population is assigned number and then numbers chosen by random)
- stratified random sampling (break down population into characteristics then use simple random sampling from each group- equal chance of being chosen from each group, can alter proportions from each group to match population)
- random cluster sampling (for when population is spread out e.g different GP surgeries, random select areas then randomly select sample from chosen areas, equal chance of each area being chosen then equal chance of being chosen in area)
What are parameters and statistics?
A parameter is a measurable quality being looked at in the population.
The parameter in the sample is a statistic.
Statistic (sample) is used to make inferences about parameter (population) but will always be a margin of error as sample isn’t the whole population so will always be sampling error.
What are the problems with collecting data?
To do with reliability, validity and avoiding bias
What are the key points for data analysis in research process?
- shows how data was analysed
- quant uses statistical analysis
- qualitative may use thematics (phenomenological approach) and good practise to follow and reference a specific approach
Methods of data collection in qualitative research?
Social media monitoring(possible as publicly available information)
Observation
Focus groups
Interviews
Questionnaires/ surveys
What are some issues with data collection in qualitative research?
Reliability (precision) bias in data collection.
Validity (accuracy) can be researcher bias (influence of researcher on data as they decide themes so assumptions and prejudices) or reactivity bias which is the influence researcher has on respondents such as asking leading questions or respondent bias when respondents don’t answer honestly maybe to please researcher it is it’s a threatening/embarrassing topic
Is qualitative research generalisable?
Harder the generalise than quantitative as if repeated may get very different results as it’s based on a few people’s experiences at a particular time and everyone experiences things differently
What knowledge does qualitative research create?
New knowledge
Often raises social, cultural and political concerns or info about bias.