Causes ofCharles I’s decision in 1629 to rule alone, without calling parliament. Flashcards
Immediate (short-term) cause political
- The asasination of the Duke of Buckingham
Underlying (long-term) causes social
- Charles I support of Arminians
- The asasination of the Duke of Buckingham
Immediate (short-term) cause political
- Charles I support of Arminians
Underlying (long-term) causes political
How James I preserved unity in the church
Was weary of Arminians disrupting the harmony of the church so in appointments favored the orthodox Calvinist Anglicans such as George Abbot. Protestants then felt secure that the Elizabethan church was still upheld, preserving the unity of the church
Was weary of Arminians disrupting the harmony of the church so in appointments favored the orthodox Calvinist Anglicans such as George Abbot. Protestants then felt secure that the Elizabethan church was still upheld, preserving the unity of the church
How James I preserved unity in the church
What destroyed the unity of the church
Charles I favoring and supporting the Arminians
Charles I favoring and supporting the Arminians
What destroyed the unity of the church
Why did Charles I favor Arminians
- His personal religious beliefs were similar.
- Like Arminians, he loved order, ornate decor and ceremony.
- Arminians supported the divine right of monarchs
- His personal religious beliefs were similar.
- Like Arminians, he loved order, ornate decor and ceremony.
- Arminians supported the divine right of monarchs
Why did Charles I favor Arminians
How did appointing Arminians help Charles I
Arminians totally supported royal authority and preached the divine right of monarchs. Appointing Arminians to key church positions would establish a network of loyal and disciplined clergy who would reinforce royal government.
Arminians totally supported royal authority and preached the divine right of monarchs. Appointing Arminians to key church positions would establish a network of loyal and disciplined clergy who would reinforce royal government.
How did appointing Arminians help Charles I
Why did the Arminians offend the majority of England’s political nation
their different views of church doctrine and practice offended the most deeply held religious beliefs of the majority of England’s political nation. The Arminian doctrine of free will, together with the emphasis on ritual and ceremony, seemed to many to make them little different from Catholics.
their different views of church doctrine and practice offended the most deeply held religious beliefs of the majority of England’s political nation. The Arminian doctrine of free will, together with the emphasis on ritual and ceremony, seemed to many to make them little different from Catholics.
Why did the Arminians offend the majority of England’s political nation
Arminian Anglicans beliefs
- Catholic doctrine of free will
- Love of ceremony and decor
- ‘Beauty of holiness’
- Support of the King
- Catholic doctrine of free will
- Love of ceremony and decor
- ‘Beauty of holiness’
- Support of the King
Arminian Anglicans beliefs
Orthodox (Calvinist) Anglicans beliefs
- Calvinist doctrine of predestination
- Plainer service and decor
- Less attention to ceremony
- Support of majority of political nation
- Calvinist doctrine of predestination
- Plainer service and decor
- Less attention to ceremony
- Support of majority of political nation
Orthodox (Calvinist) Anglicans beliefs
Who was Richard Montagu
an Essex rector who published a tract claiming that the Church of England was a Catholic rather than a Calvinist church. It was, he claimed, a ‘purer’ Catholic church than the one headed by the Pope.
an Essex rector who published a tract claiming that the Church of England was a Catholic rather than a Calvinist church. It was, he claimed, a ‘purer’ Catholic church than the one headed by the Pope.
Who was Richard Montagu
How did Richard Montagu contribute to the deterioating relationship between the crown and parliament
While Orthodox Anglicans believed it was heresy, James I found little to offend him in Montagu’s writings and Charles I liked them.
While Orthodox Anglicans believed it was heresy, James I found little to offend him in Montagu’s writings and Charles I liked them.
How did Richard Montagu contribute to the deterioating relationship between the crown and parliament
Richard Montagu when Charles I took over
Parliament began proceedings against Montagu, Charles made him his personal chaplain. Three years later he became a bishop.
Parliament began proceedings against Montagu, Charles made him his personal chaplain. Three years later he became a bishop.
Richard Montagu when Charles I took over
Buckingham’s meeting in 1626
Buckingham arranged a conference to discuss Montagu’s writings. During it to the dismay of orthodox Anglicans and Puritans alike, it became clear Buckingham also favoured the Arminian
Buckingham arranged a conference to discuss Montagu’s writings. During it to the dismay of orthodox Anglicans and Puritans alike, it became clear Buckingham also favoured the Arminian
Buckingham’s meeting in 1626
Who was Archbishop Abbot
The moderate Calvinist Anglican George Abbot was still Archbishop of Canterbury and would remain so until his death in 1633
The moderate Calvinist Anglican George Abbot was still Archbishop of Canterbury and would remain so until his death in 1633
Who was Archbishop Abbot
Decline of Archbishop Abbot 1621
