causes of the revolution Flashcards
Britain after the war
- emerged from the war with a vastly increased empire in NA as well as an increased national debt
- the colonies had escaped paying for the war although they benefited from the defeat of France
stronger imperial authority and concerns
- defence was a major concern because as colonial boundaries moved westwards, there was the likelihood of Native American attacks
- government had to be provided for 80,000 French Canadians
- a coherent western policy was needed to reconcile the conflicting needs of land settlement, the fur trade and Native Americans
- The seven years war made it apparent that smuggling was a prevalent business
Grenville’s concern of national debt
- his main concern was reducing the national debt
- annual interest was £4.4 million while the annual income was only £8 million
- to solve this, he had little option but to increase taxation and reduce expenditure
- supported the notion that Americans should contribute to the cost of their own defence as they paid far less tax than the average British person
how stronger imperial authority was enforced
- in 1763, Bute announced that 10,000 British troops were needed as a permanent army in NA
- believed the colonists should contribute something to the expense
Grenville and administration + defence
- he found the cost of colonial administration and defence a major concern
- had risen from £70,000 in 1748 to £350,000 in 1763
- more money would be required to maintain the troops in the colonies necessary to hold Canada and manage the Native tribes
Pontiac’s rebellion
- Pontiac and the Ohio Valley tribes rose in revolt in 1763, fearing further encroachments on their lands by white settler colonists
- destroyed every British post west of Niagra, killing and capturing hundreds of colonists
- British forces lifted the siege of Detroit, using bribes to detach most of the Iroquois people from Pontiac and to persuade the southern tribes to remain neutral
impact of Pontiac’s rebellion
- the Natives were defeated by British soldiers paid for by Britain
- confirmed the view that the colonies were unable and unwilling to provide for their own defence, and so there was a need for British troops
the 1763 Proclamation Line
- prohibited the colonists from settling on lands acquired from the French following the war
- advanced government efforts to discourage westward expansion
- feared that Anglo-American presence in western territory would encourage Native violence
- intended as a temporary boundary that could be extended further west in an orderly, lawful manner
- aimed to minimise conflict and ensure that white expansion was controlled
failure of the Proclamation Line
- intended to alleviate tensions between settlers and Natives, yet the colonists ignored and disregarded this measure and moved west and so didn’t create serious discontent
- the measure was poorly enforced
around 30,000 colonists ignored the restriction and moved west by 1768 - Britain accepted the breakdown of the Proclamation Line by 1768
impact of the Proclamation Line
- marked the beginning of a clear ideological break with Britain
- colonists and land speculators objected to the proclamation boundary as the government had already assigned land grants to them, with the plans to settle the land to grow business
- colonial resentment of the proclamation contributed to the growing divide between the colonies and Britain
- led to increased tensions as some saw the decree as an act of overreach, in that it was unnecessary, and it violated their right to self-govern
reasons for Grenville’s anti-smuggling measures
- hoped to use the trade laws to extract more revenue from the colonists
- this could prove difficult as the colonial customs service was inefficient due to smuggling and the fact that officers were frequently corrupt
- this meant the colonists evaded most of the customs duties
Grenvile’s anti-smuggling measures 1763
- colonial customs officials had to reside in America rather than delegating duties to deputies
- to counter the leniency of colonial juries towards smugglers, jurisdiction in revenue cases was transferred from colonial courts to a vice-admiralty court in Halifax where only the judge would decide the verdict
- represented a challenge to the colonial legal system
1764 Sugar Act- raise revenue
- cut the duty on foreign molasses and sugar from 6 to 3 pence per gallon
- retained a high duty on foreign refined sugar
- prohibited the importation of all foreign rum
- affected New England, where distilling sugar and molasses into rum was a major industry
- taxed numerous foreign products, including wine, coffee, and textiles
1764 Currency Act
- placed a ban on colonial paper money
- largely aimed at Virginia as it had issued a large amount of paper money during the war
- appeased British merchants who insisted colonial debts be paid in a more acceptable currency
impact of the currency act
- was introduced during a time of economic depression which significantly damaged the colonies
- the deflationary effects of the Act threatened some colonists with ruin
impact of the Sugar Act
- represented a fundamental revision of relations
- by imposing duties to raise revenue, Britain was essentially taxing colonists who were unrepresented in Parliament
impact of the Sugar and Currency Acts on relations
- the economic impact rather than the constitutional issue of taxation without representation that was the main focus for the colonists
- NE ports suffered economic losses from the Sugar Act as the stricter enforcement made smuggling molasses more dangerous
- argued the profit margin on rum was too small to support any tax on molasses
- many colonists feared being priced out of the market
American suspicions
- the colonists regarded themselves as good Whigs
- concerned with the old Whig issues of resisting arbitrary power, upholding popular rights and defending the integrity of representative institutions
- the writings of early 18thc British radical whigs who condemned ministers for conspiring to undermine traditional freedoms had wide support in the colonies
American fears
- many colonists were also convinced of the need to guard against attempts to expand executive power by stealth
- the position of Bute caused significant concern as many feared he was still a power behind the throne
influence of John Wilkes
- many colonists identified with the radical British MP and journal editor
- he demanded freedom of the press and a more democratic Parliament
- in 1763, after he had criticised the king and accused ministers of being the ‘tools of despotism and corruption’, he was arrested and imprisoned
- suggested that the British government was trampling on British and colonial liberties
American opposition in 1764- political
- by 1765, 9 colonial assemblies sent messages to London
- argued Parliament had abused its power by introducing the Sugar Act
- conceded its right to regulate trade, but didn’t accept its right to tax to raise revenue in the colonies
- 50 Boston merchants agreed to stop purchasing British luxury imports, and in both Boston and NYC there were movements to increase colonial manufacturing
American opposition in 1764- Otis
- published ‘The Rights of the British Colonies Asserted and Proved’ in 1764
- criticised Parliament’s new aggressiveness towards the colonies
- asserted there should be no taxation without the people’s consent
American opposition in 1764- Sam Adams
- in 1764, he drafted a report on the Sugar Act for the Massachusetts Assembly
- denounced the act as an infringement of the rights of the colonists as British subjects
overall compliance with the Sugar Act
- despite objections from assemblies and individuals, most colonists complied with the Sugar Act as few were directly affected by it
- many colonists saw the new Sugar Act as a replacement for the earlier act and not as a way to make money
- this compliance gave Grenville the confidence to proceed with the Stamp Act