Causation + remoteness Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Causation

A

The claimant must establish a causal link between the defendant’s breach of contract and its loss in order to recover damages.

This means assessing:
(a) Whether in fact the breach by the defendant has caused the loss suffered by the claimant (known as factual causation) - treated in a broad way; and also

(b) Whether as a matter of law the defendant should be held responsible for it (legal causation) - if there are any NAI. If the intervening event was ‘likely to happen’, it generally will not be held to break the chain of causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Remoteness of damage in contract

A

Test in Hadley v Baxendale

Loss of a type ordinarily and naturally arising from the breach

or

The particular defendant had sufficient actual knowledge of the particular and special circumstances to be aware of the risk

most rationales point towards the remoteness rules limiting the recoverable losses to those losses that a contracting party would or should have been aware of as being likely to flow from the breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Who has the burden of proving duress?

A

The party who alleges the contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the effect of a voidable contract?

A

The contract is valid and binding unless it is rescinded by the innocent party.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is duress?

A

Violence or illegitimate threats or pressure which coerce the party into entering into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What would be considered legitimate commercial pressure?

A

Threat to take business elsewhere.

Selling to competitor or not giving discount in the future.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What must be established for economic duress to be found?

A

There must be pressure whose practical effect is lack of practical choice which is illegitimate and a significant cause inducing claimant to enter into contract.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What will the court consider to see if there has been illegitimate pressure?

A

Whether there has been actual or threatened breach of contract.

If the threat was made in good or bad faith

Whether the victim protested at the time

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

promissory estoppel general principles

A

There must be a pre-existing contractual relationship. This was suggested in the High Trees House case itself.

There should be a clear and unambiguous promise evidenced by either words or conduct (see Woodhouse AC Israel Cocoa Ltd SA v Nigerian Produce Marketing Co Ltd [1972] AC 741).

The party to whom the promise was made must have relied on the promise although this does not have to be to their detriment (see Alan v El Nasr [1972] 2 All ER 127).

The doctrine can only be used ‘as a shield and not a sword’ (see Combe v Combe [1951] 2 KB 215).
What this means is that it can only be used as a defence and cannot form the basis of an action or to create new rights.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

privity of contract

A

a contract can only create rights and obligations that bind those who are parties to the contract. (see Tweddle v Atkinson [1861] 25 JP 517).

This is in keeping with the general principle that a contract is an agreement which is entered into freely by those who are party to it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are the key common law exceptions of privity of contract

A

agency, collateral contracts, assignment, claiming damages on behalf of another and the related equitable exception of the constructive trust.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is agency?

A

one party (the agent) makes a contract on behalf of another party (the principal). The agent will act as an intermediary with the other party to the contract, but when it is formed the contract will be with the principal and not the agent.

The principal will therefore, in effect, be a third party during any negotiations but will be directly bound by the contract once it is concluded.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly