Causation & Concurrence Flashcards

1
Q

What two types of causation must be proven to establish criminal liability?

A
    1. Actual: D’s conduct must be an actual or but-for cause of the social harm
    1. Proximate: D’s conduct must be the proximate or legal cause of the social harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Actual Causation:

What must the court show?

What test is used?

A
  • Court must show D’s conduct (or omission) is a causal factor of the social harm
  • But-For Test: But for D’s voluntary act (or omission) would the social harm have occurred when it did?
  • If answer is no, D is an actual cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Proximate causation is a question of

whether it is (blank)

to hold D liable

A
  • Proximate cause inquiry is an examination into the question whether it is fair and just to hold the D criminally liable
  • No hard and fast rule for this
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Proximate Causation takes (blank)

into consideration

A
  • Takes Intervening Causes into consideration
  • Acts or events that come after D’s act but before the social harm and contribute causally to the social harm
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

CAUSATION

Intervening cause analysis differs depending on whether the cause is

(blank)

or

(blank)

A

• Intervening cause analysis differs depending on whether the cause is a dependent (responsive) cause or independent (coincidental) cause

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

CAUSATION

Dependent Intervening Cause

Definition and General Rule w/ exception

A

Cause that is dependent on or responsive to the D’s voluntary act

• If dependent, general rule is that the D is the proximate cause unless the intervening cause is extremely unusual or bizarre

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

CAUSATION

Independent Cause:

Definition and application

A

Independent: cause is independent of or coincidental to the D’s voluntary act

  • Generally D is not proximate cause unless the intervening cause is foreseeable
  • Some courts focus on the foreseeability of the social harm, as opposed to the foreseeability of the intervening cause
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

CONCURRENCE

What is it?

A

Final basic element of a crime

  • Mandates a connection between the actus reus and the mens rea.
  • The guilty act and the guilty mind must interlock
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

CONCURRENCE

What two types of concurrence must be present

A
    1. Temporal Concurrence: Required mens rea must be present at the same time the D performed the actus reus
    1. Motivational Concurrence: the mens rea must be the motivating force behind the actus reus
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly