Causation & Concurrence Flashcards
What two types of causation must be proven to establish criminal liability?
- Actual: D’s conduct must be an actual or but-for cause of the social harm
- Proximate: D’s conduct must be the proximate or legal cause of the social harm
Actual Causation:
What must the court show?
What test is used?
- Court must show D’s conduct (or omission) is a causal factor of the social harm
- But-For Test: But for D’s voluntary act (or omission) would the social harm have occurred when it did?
- If answer is no, D is an actual cause
Proximate causation is a question of
whether it is (blank)
to hold D liable
- Proximate cause inquiry is an examination into the question whether it is fair and just to hold the D criminally liable
- No hard and fast rule for this
Proximate Causation takes (blank)
into consideration
- Takes Intervening Causes into consideration
- Acts or events that come after D’s act but before the social harm and contribute causally to the social harm
CAUSATION
Intervening cause analysis differs depending on whether the cause is
(blank)
or
(blank)
• Intervening cause analysis differs depending on whether the cause is a dependent (responsive) cause or independent (coincidental) cause
CAUSATION
Dependent Intervening Cause
Definition and General Rule w/ exception
Cause that is dependent on or responsive to the D’s voluntary act
• If dependent, general rule is that the D is the proximate cause unless the intervening cause is extremely unusual or bizarre
CAUSATION
Independent Cause:
Definition and application
Independent: cause is independent of or coincidental to the D’s voluntary act
- Generally D is not proximate cause unless the intervening cause is foreseeable
- Some courts focus on the foreseeability of the social harm, as opposed to the foreseeability of the intervening cause
CONCURRENCE
What is it?
Final basic element of a crime
- Mandates a connection between the actus reus and the mens rea.
- The guilty act and the guilty mind must interlock
CONCURRENCE
What two types of concurrence must be present
- Temporal Concurrence: Required mens rea must be present at the same time the D performed the actus reus
- Motivational Concurrence: the mens rea must be the motivating force behind the actus reus