Causation (Common Law) Flashcards
to convict defendant of a “result” crime (murder), the prosecution must show defendant acted with necessary mens rea and committed the required acts or acted with necessary attendant circumstances, and also that defendant caused required result (victim’s death)
Causation
__________ is issue in result crimes
Causation
_________ issues arise for most part in criminal homicide cases
Causation
Common law causation analysis has 2 parts
(actual cause/cause in fact and proximate cause/legal cause)
But for test– a person’s conduct is ______ cause of prohibited result if result would not have occurred but for actor’s conduct.
Actual Cause
(1) Identify relevant conduct – what are relevant voluntary act(s) committed by defendant? If case based on omission, substitute omission
(2) Question – “but for defendant’s act(s)/omission would social harm (death) have occurred when it did?”
- If yes – if social harm would have occurred when did even if defendant had not acted, defendant is not actual cause, not guilty
- If no – if social harm would not have occurred when it did but for defendant’s acts, defendant is actual cause, then move on to proximate cause
Steps for determining actual cause
person who is actual cause of resulting harm not responsible for harm unless also is _______ (legal) cause of harm
Proximate Cause
_________ cause identifies potential candidates for legal responsibility for result. _________ cause determines who among candidates should be held accountable (lineup)
Actual and Proximate
Was there any actual but for cause of result that came into picture after defendant’s voluntary act? If not, defendant was___________of social harm.
Direct Cause
Intervening cause
Apparent Safety Doctrine
Free, Deliberate, Informed Human Intervention
Intended Consequences Doctrine
De Minimus Cause
Omissions
Factors of Causation
actual cause of social harm that arises after defendant’s causal contribution to result. Occurs after defendant’s conduct but before result for which defendant is being prosecuted.
Intervening cause
occurs in response to defendant’s earlier conduct
Dependent/responsive cause
force that does not occur in response to initial wrongdoer’s conduct
Independent/coincidental cause
______________ intervening cause does not relieve initial wrongdoer of criminal responsibility unless response was unforeseeable and highly abnormal
Dependent/responsive cause
Defendant not responsible for _________ intervening cause unless occurrence was foreseeable to reasonable person in defendant’s situation.
Independent/coincidental cause