Causation and Remoteness Flashcards

1
Q

“But for” test

A

Barnett v Kensington & Chelsea Healthcare

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Causation

A
“But for”
Material contribution to harm 
Material contribution to risk
Multiple causes 
Novus Actus Interveniuns
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Material contribution to harm

A

Bonnington

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Material contribution to risk

A

McGhee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What happens when they’re are multiple and subsequent causes …

A

Performance Cars v Abraham - the OG “but for”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Novus Actus Interveniens

Act of C

A

Act of C - McKew v Holland

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Remoteness

A

The Wagon Mound (No 1) damage must be reasonably foreseeable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Novus Actus Interveniens

Act of 3P

A

Act of 3P - The Oropesa “unwarrantable, unreasonable and extrinsic”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Novus Actus Interveniens

Natural event

A

Carslogie Steamship loss for collision only

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Novus Actus Interveniens

Subsequent act of D

A

Chester v Afshar

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly