Causation Flashcards

1
Q

What is the term for factual cause?

A

causa sine qua non (But for)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is factual causation?

A

but for a breach of duty P would not have suffered harm.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What cases states that the doctors negligence must will only be a causa sine qua non if other reasonable doctors would have been able to save the patient?

A

Bolitho v City and Hackeny Health Authority

Barnett v Chelsea and Ken Hsptl MGMT

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Which Scottish case states that it must be proven that medical mistake was the material cause of the injury suffered?

A

Kay’s Tutor v Aryshire Health Board.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Which case had to prove that but for smoking John Player’s the P would not have got lung cancer?

A

McTear v Imperial Tobacco

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is similar about all these cases?

A

The harm would have taken place even if it wasn’t for the intervention of P.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the term for legal cause?

A

causa causans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is a novus actus interveniens

A

A new and independent causal incident

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Which case stated that survival rate had to be 50% in the first place in order for their to be causation?

A

Greggs v Scott

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Which case found that there was no causation because even if a safety belt had been provided it would not have been worn?

A

McWilliams

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What did the case of Wardlaw suggest should happen when there is more than one source of harm?

A

If it can be found that the breach of duty was a material cause then it will satisfy causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What case concerns risk and consecutive contributions?

A

McGhee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What does McGhee state?

A

That to materially contribute and to materially increase the risk of injury are both causa sine que non. IT does not matter if contribution happened consecutively.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What case modified causation where precise scientific evidence was lacking?

A

Fairchild

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Why was Fairchild decided in the way it was?

A

To give justice to employees in the face of corporation. There had been breaches by all the employers P had worked for the only difficulty came in identifying exact who caused it. Thus liability should be shared.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Who is the onus on for NAI?

A

P to prove that it broke causal chain.

17
Q

What case proves that if P takes a reasonably foreseeable course of action then D will still be held liable ‘but for’?

A

Sayers

18
Q

Which case proves that if P’s conduct is not reasonable and careful then it will constiute a NAI?

A

McKew

19
Q

What case is good comparison to McKew showing that reaonable conduct will not be a NAI?

A

Spencer v Wincanton

20
Q

Which case found that the last act is not always an NAI?

A

Davidson v City of Glasgow