Causation Flashcards

1
Q

What do you have to consider for factual causation?

A

The ‘but for’ test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the case for factual causation?

A

R vs White

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the POL from R vs White

A

But for the defendants actions, the victim would’ve died anyway from the heart attack so he isn’t liable.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are the 3 factors for legal causation?

A
  1. Original injury = Operative cause of death
  2. Intervening act = Reasonably foreseeable
  3. Thin skull test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the case for ‘Original injury = operative cause of death’?

A

R vs Smith

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the POL from R vs Smith?

A

The medical treatment did not overwhelm the stab wound so the operative cause of death remained as the original injury which was the stab wound.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the case for ‘Intervening act = Reasonably foreseeable’?

A

R vs Corbett

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the POL from R vs Corbett?

A

All events were reasonably foreseeable so there was no break in the chain of causation.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the case for the thin skull test?

A

R vs Blaue

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What is the POL from R vs Blaue?

A

As the victim was a Jehova, a blood transfusion is against their faith so it was considered a ‘pre-existing condition’ and the defendant has to take their victim how they find them.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly