Causation Flashcards
First branch of causation in German tort law
Liability founding causation
Relation between conduct and infringement of the right
What does the first branch of German tort law require?
Certainty that the conduct caused some sort of harm
Second branch of causation in German tort law
Liability specifying causation
Relation between the infringement of the right and the damage
What does the second branch of German tort law require?
Rational and a reasonable level of conviction between loss and damage
First branch of causation in English tort law
Factual causation
But for test
Second branch of causation in English tort law
Legal causation
Foreseeability
Wagon mound - reasonable person could have foreseen some type of damage would be suffered
Two elements needed for causation in French tort law
Certain and direct
How is certainty established in French tort law?
Proof and probability of type of damage
How is directness established in French tort law?
- Foreseeability of the actual damage
- Covered by the scope of the duty
- Can it be debuted by an external cause?
Looking at successive causes, if the second event causes the same damage as the first event, who is liable?
All jurisdictions hold the first tortfeasor liable
Looking at successive causes, if no one is liable for the second event and it caused the same damage as the first event who is liable?
France - original tortfeasor remains liable
Germany and England - first tortfeasor only liable up to the second event
Looking at successive events, if the second event increases the damage from the first event, who is liable?
First tortfeasor will be jointly liable with second tortfeasor if the second event can be attributed to the first event
Explain uncertain causation
Two potential causes, unsure which caused the damage.
Explain joint causation
If the damage was caused by multiple causes and each alone can explain the full damage.
What does res ipsa loquitur mean (translation and definition), when is it used?
The facts speak for themselves.
Used in English causation, if the facts speak for themselves, the burden of proof is reversed and the claimant’s word is taken as fact unless proven otherwise by the defendant has to prove what the claimant is saying