Causation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

First branch of causation in German tort law

A

Liability founding causation

Relation between conduct and infringement of the right

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What does the first branch of German tort law require?

A

Certainty that the conduct caused some sort of harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Second branch of causation in German tort law

A

Liability specifying causation

Relation between the infringement of the right and the damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the second branch of German tort law require?

A

Rational and a reasonable level of conviction between loss and damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

First branch of causation in English tort law

A

Factual causation

But for test

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Second branch of causation in English tort law

A

Legal causation

Foreseeability
Wagon mound - reasonable person could have foreseen some type of damage would be suffered

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Two elements needed for causation in French tort law

A

Certain and direct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How is certainty established in French tort law?

A

Proof and probability of type of damage

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How is directness established in French tort law?

A
  • Foreseeability of the actual damage
  • Covered by the scope of the duty
  • Can it be debuted by an external cause?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Looking at successive causes, if the second event causes the same damage as the first event, who is liable?

A

All jurisdictions hold the first tortfeasor liable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Looking at successive causes, if no one is liable for the second event and it caused the same damage as the first event who is liable?

A

France - original tortfeasor remains liable

Germany and England - first tortfeasor only liable up to the second event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Looking at successive events, if the second event increases the damage from the first event, who is liable?

A

First tortfeasor will be jointly liable with second tortfeasor if the second event can be attributed to the first event

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Explain uncertain causation

A

Two potential causes, unsure which caused the damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Explain joint causation

A

If the damage was caused by multiple causes and each alone can explain the full damage.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What does res ipsa loquitur mean (translation and definition), when is it used?

A

The facts speak for themselves.

Used in English causation, if the facts speak for themselves, the burden of proof is reversed and the claimant’s word is taken as fact unless proven otherwise by the defendant has to prove what the claimant is saying

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consequence of joint causation in all 3 legal systems?

A

Joint and several liability

17
Q

Consequence of uncertain causation in England and Germany?

A

Several liability only

18
Q

Consequence of uncertain causation in France?

A

joint and several liability

19
Q

Explain joint liability

A

The claimant has a claim against any of the defendants up to the full amount and must choose the deeper pockets.

20
Q

Explain several liability

A

Claimant can sue each of the defendants separately for the amount their damage was equal to

21
Q

Explain joint and several liability

A

Claimant can sue any of the defendants up to the full amount of compensation

Defendants sue each other for recourse.