Causation Flashcards

1
Q

What are the two steps to establish causation?

A
  1. Factual causation
  2. Legal causation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What test is used for factual causation and how does it apply?

A

‘But for’ test: On balance of probabilities but for D’s breach of duty would C have suffered loss?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

The but for test is satisfied on the basis of the balance of probabilities; how does this apply (especially for cases where there are multiple potential causes)?

A

more than 50% chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What does the Chester case say about factual causation with regards to a failure to advise?

A

but for test satisfied if C, if warned, would not have had operation or deferred to a later date

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

When can factual causation be established where the but for test is not satisfied?

A
  1. Material Contribution test
  2. Material increase in risk
  3. Loss of chance
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the material contribution test?

A

Breach materially contributed to harm

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is meant by material contribution?

A

‘more than negligible’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Can the material contribution test apply to sequential cumulative causes?

A

Yes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What cases are material increase in risk used for?

A

Industrial disease, single agent cases e.g. mesothelioma

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What cases may loss of chance be allowed to prove factual causation withotu the but for test?

A

Pure economic loss where real and substantial chance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is apportionment?

A

courts apportion liability between defendants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the particular apportionment rule for mesothelioma cases?

A

Defendants jointly and severally liable (can recover from each other)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Can a defendant be liable for loss caused by a third party after their original tortious act?

A

Yes if loss still the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How does liability work where there are multiple sufficient causes?

A
  • D2 not liable if not caused additional damage
  • two tortious events - D1 liable for initial injuries past T2, D2 liable for additional losses
  • Tort followed by natural event = liable for damage up to natural event
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What are the novus actus interveniens for legal causation?

A
  • acts of god
  • acts of third parties
  • acts of the claimant
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

When will an act of god break the chain of causation?

A

Exceptional natural event

17
Q

When will an act of god not break the chain of causation?

A

Could have been foreseen

18
Q

When will an act of a third party break the chain of causation?

A

Highly unforeseeable

19
Q

When will an act of a third party break the chain where it is medical treatment?

A

So gross and egregious as to be unforeseeable

20
Q

When will an act of the claimant break the chain of causation?

A

Highly unreasonable

21
Q

What is the effect of novus actus interveniens breaking the chain of causation?

A

Defendant liable for losses up to the break in chain