Causal inferences: bias, confounding and interaction Flashcards
Bias
occurs as a result of an error in the design, organization or analysis of a study and may result in an incorrect assessment of an exposure’s influence on the risk of developing a specific disease
Two common types of bias
information bias
selection bias
Selection bias
if cases and controls that were selected showed some noticeable link between exposure and disease but there was no association this may have occurred as a result of selection bias
Selection bias id divide in two
Non-respondent bias: when participants that respond to a survey respond in a way that is diff from the people who do not respond
Exclusion bias: when investigator uses dissimilar eligibility criteria to select the cases and controls
Information bias
can arise when the way info is gathered about participants in a study is not complete or accurate enough. This may result in a portion of the info related to exposures or disease outcome being wrong
Misclassification bias
participants are misclassified for instance cases are misclassified as controls or vice versa. Exposure status may also be inaccurate if person is not aware that they have been exposed or feels that they were exposed when they were not
Two types of misclassification bias
differential: rate of misclassification varies in separate groups
non-differential: problems with accuracy of data collection from both separate study groups, cases and controls
Some forms and sources of info bias
bias in abstracting records interviewing from surrogate interviews surveillance bias recall bias reporting bias
Confounding
true association is observed but in actual fact does not exist, caused by a third factor
e.g. we find a link between factor A and a disease we may assume that the factor A causes the disease. But factor X which is associated with factor A ( but is not a result of factor A) may also be a risk factor for the disease. Factor X may then be the real factor that lead to the development of disease and not factor A but because factor A was studied, the results seem to indicate that it is associated with the development of the disease
What is a confounder
a 3rd factor that must be considered when deciding whether an association is causal
Problems with confounding
designing and carrying out a study where the cases are matched to the controls for the factor suspected to be a confounder
analysis of the data by stratification or adjustment
Interaction
when two or more risk factors modify the incidence of disease and the joint effect of the two causal factors differ from what would be expected when adding their effects when they are acting independently
Synergism
positive interaction
occurs when the combined effect of the two factors is greater than what we would expect
Antagonism
negative interaction
combined effect of the two factors is less that what we anticipate
Steps in looking for an interaction
establish if there is confounding
if not, then there is an interaction
If association is equally strong in diff strata that were determined according to a third variable then there is no interaction
If there is an interaction then calculate incidence after exposure using addition model and multiplicative model
Choice of which model to use depends on biology of disease