casual reasoning Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q
  1. What does correlation mean?
A

Connection between one or more things, measure of how things are related.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q
  1. What does causation mean?
A

Where a change in one variable affects the other variable; also referred to as cause and effect.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q
  1. What is accidental causation?
A

High correlation is the result of not having enough data. Correlation data are more useful when they involve a large range of causes.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q
  1. What happens when the causal direction is reversed?
A

Sometimes C is correlated with E not because C causes E, but because E causes C. Correlation by itself does not tell us which of these two stories (if any) is correct.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q
  1. What are hidden common causes?
A

Sometimes C and E are correlated not because one causes the other but because there is a hidden condition X that causes both C and E.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q
  1. Outline causation as a result of side effects
A

In some cases where C correlates with E because E occurs together with some other condition or side effect that actually causes E. The casual contribution from C to E might be non- existent or of lesser importance. The placebo effect is a good example of causation due to side effect. It refers to the real or felt improvement in a patient’s condition that is due to beliefs about the treatment rather than the medical efficacy of the treatment itself.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q
  1. What is the Pygmalion effect?
A

The Pygmalion effect originated from a study where teachers were told that some of their students were above average even through, they were randomly selected with the same average abilities. But the subjective expectation of the teachers somehow led to better performance by these students later on. The result has been replicated in other contexts, and this has important implications for education and management.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q
  1. Describe covariation and manipulability
A

If changes in one event correspond to changes in another event, then this makes it more probable that one causes the other. In reality, manipulating correlation can sometimes be difficult or even unethical to do.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q
  1. Outline casual relevance
A

Casual relevance: Suppose a student failed a course. She might have been lazy or having personal problems. Or perhaps she was ill on the day of the exam. All these factors could have contributed to her failure. They were ill casually relevant, each being a cause of her failure but none being the cause. The most important one is the primary or central cause.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q
  1. Outline casually necessary and sufficient conditions
A

Casually necessary and sufficient conditions: X is usually necessary for Y when Y would both happen without X, and X is casually sufficient for Y when X by itself is enough for Y. Water is casually necessary but not sufficient for our survival, and moving electric charges are sufficient but not necessary for the presence of a magnetic field. But X can be casually relevant to Y if X is neither casually necessary nor sufficient relevant to Y even if X is neither causally necessary nor sufficient for Y.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q
  1. Outline triggers
A

Triggers: A triggering cause is a cause that starts off a chain of events leading to an effect. Whereas a structural cause is a background condition that is casually relevant to the effect but which on its own is not sufficient for it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q
  1. Outline proximity
A

Proximity: A proximate cause happen at a time near the occurrence of the effect, whereas a distal cause happened much earlier

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q
  1. Outline randomness and casual determination
A

Randomness and casual determination: A random event is one that is not casually determined by what happen earlier. To say that an event is determined is to say that is must occur given what has happened earlier and the physical laws of our universe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
  1. Outline mill’s method of agreement
A

If two or more situations lading to an effect E has only one event C in common, then C is the cause of E.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q
  1. Outline mill’s method of difference
A

If one group of situations leads to an effect E, but another group does not, and the only difference between the two groups is that C is present in the former but not the latter, then C is the cause of E.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q
  1. Outline mill’s Joint Method
A

Suppose one group of situations leads to an effect E, but another group does not. If C is the only factor common to situations in the first group, and it is also the only factor that is absent from all the situations in the second group, then C is the cause of E.

17
Q
  1. Outline Mill’s Method of Concomitant Variation
A

If variation in some factor C is followed by variation in an effect E, then C is the cause of E.

18
Q
  1. Outline the method of residues
A

If a set if conditions causes a range of effects, and some of the effects can be explained by some of the earlier conditions, then the remaining effects are cued by the other remaining conditions. “If we have a range of factors believed to be the causes of a range of effects, and we have reason to believe that all of the factors, except C are the cause for all the effects, except one, then we should infer that C is the cause of the remaining effect.”

19
Q
  1. Outline the limitations of Mill’s Method
A
  • The true cause might not be any of the candidate causes.
  • The effect might have more than one cause.
  • Causation can be indeterministic.