cases written in lesson Flashcards

1
Q

omissions

A

r v dytham
- defendant was a plice offier witnessed the was wted the v

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

r v dytham

A
  • police officer has a duty to public. due tohis official position.

court held that the police officer has a duty of caren to all of of society

can also uses thin in law in justice, nd morality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

manslaughter

A

r v vans ddict. mother and sister brought duagter heroin. sheinjected it herdelf, in her mother house.
victim was a herion addict
became clear she had overdosed she put her to sleep

  • created a dangerous situation by bring the drugs to her house. life threatning situatio
  • failed to do anythig when it was clear she was overdosing. ,- gross negigance manslauhter
  • failed to intervne
  • ommisios - fails to interveine - danger category .
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

strict liability

WATCH HIS VIDEO

A

sweet v parsley
defendat rented her property to tenants during their teenancy drugs were found ith in the property.

d was concerned in the

  • origally was found guility. she appealed and they she was found not guilty.
  • needed mens rrea. steffany sweet had no mens rea when the case reached the house of courts.
  • stirct liability, morality , justice question , judical precedant - reversing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

r v gibbens and proctor

A

crimnal law
muder
ommission

  • gibisons wife had left her resulting in him and his dsughter, nelly gaed 7 moving in wit a nther women. EDIT
  • gibbions and proctor were both convicted for ommison
  • failed duty o care by relationship.
  • proctor had taken up this responsability wne taking her into her house tkimg rle as mother
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

r v dawe

loss of control - qalifying trigger
- lack of fear trigger
d has nsihted the violenvce - brought it upon them self

A

defendant had come hoe saw his wide wit naother man. got a vodka bottle.
v too te vodka bottle to use as a defence

appeal dimissed, defence not available
he sdtarted the figh n th first palce.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

r v jewell
loss of control

A

v and d work togeter, arrangemet of car sharing. d got out of van and shot the v in the tsomach kilig him.
denid the intending to kill.
- he said their was an explosion in hsi head
courts ruels there was evidence failed dor oss of cntrol becuase he planned the night before.

  • definiton of loss control
  • a loss of ability to act ina ccordance with considered judgemnet or a loss of normal power reasoning.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly