cases to know Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

McCulloch v Maryland

A
  • federalism, ntnl gov = supreme law of land

- creating federal bank = “necessary and proper” clause, exercise of government’s right to borrow $

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Plessy v Ferguson

A

civil rights, doctrine separate but equal, state law w/in constitution because the train cars were separate but equal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Dred Scott v Sanford

A
  • blacks aren’t citizens, prior to civil war
  • Scott claimed residence in free territory so he should be a free man, but since he’s a slave and not a citizen of the US, he can’t be a citizen of the state
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Brown v Board of Education

A
  • civil rights, separate but equal, inherently unequal for schools
  • racial segregation in public education = harmful to minority children as it is a sign of inferiority
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Miranda v Arizona

A
  • civil liberties, get miranda rights, protect against self incrimination (5th amendment)
  • had to demonstrate safeguard effective to self-incrimination, required giving rights to suspects
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Griswold v Connneticut

A
  • substantive, due process,

- right to privacy in marital relations conflicted w/ Connecticut law banning contraception, declared null and void

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Roe v Wade

A
  • allows abortion, right to privacy based on the 14th amendment
  • substantive, women has autonomy over 1st trimester
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Mapp v Ohio

A
  • civil liberties, 4th amendment incorporation, (bill of rights applies to states)
  • evidence illegally obtained by police can’t be used in criminal trial, porn trunk
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

New Jersey v TLO

A

civil liberties, 4th amendment, deals with search & seizure in schools, ruled that search in purse was unreasonable & evidence can’t be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Texas v Johnson

A

-burning of flag, it was seen as a freedom of speech protected under the 1st amendment, civil liberties, burning = expressive conduct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Tinker v Des Moines

A
  • civil liberties, 1st amendment, symbolic speech in a school setting
  • students can wear black armbands protesting the Vietnam war when such a display doesn’t disrupt class
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Gideon v Wainwright

A
  • civil liberties, 6th amendment incorporation

- right to counsel can’t be denied and extends to felonies in state courts

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Wisconsin v Yoder

A

-civil liberties, 1st amendment, freedom of religion trumps school attendance past 8th grade, amish people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

New York Times v US

A
  • civil liberties, freedom of press, pentagon papers

- publication wouldn’t harm the US & it violated the first amendment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Lemon v Kurtzman

A
  • civil liberties, 1st amendment, 3 prong limit test, freedom of religion
  • services rooted in religion & violated constitution, can’t involve with religious insitution
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Hazelwood Schoo District v Kuhlmeier

A
  • civil liberties, freedom of press @ school
  • prohibition of articles was ok due to the fact that the school could ban speech “inconsistent with shared societal values”
17
Q

Korematsu v United States

A

-civil liberties, EO 9066, need to protect against espionage outweighs rights, exclusion justified in “emergency or peril”

18
Q

Schenck v United States

A
  • civil liberties, 1st amendment, freedom of speech

- circulars mailed to draftees not protected, different in times of war

19
Q

Loving v Virginia

A

-equal protection (clause) under the 14th amendment, civil rights, interracial marriage

20
Q

Plyer v Doe

A
  • = protection, civil rights, illegal immigrants’ education

- aliens are still people, protected by the 14th amendment, disadvantaged by denying them education

21
Q

Boy Scouts of America v Dale

A
  • CR/CL, homosexual leadership denied

- “expressive association”, w/in a private institution, against values

22
Q

United States v Nixon

A

-government affairs and executive privilege, not immune form judicial review

23
Q

Santa Fe School District v Doe

A

-CL, 1st amend, religion, student led prayer violates establishment clause of 1st amend

24
Q

NAACP v Alabama

A

-1st amend, CL/CR, assembly, disclosing membership lists violates due process clause of 14th amend

25
Q

Heart of Atlanta Motel v US

A

-CR, commerce clause, congress can reg interstate commerce, hotel forbade blacks from staying there; public discrimination

26
Q

Gitlow v New York

A
  • CL, 1st amend incorporation, 1st amend applies to states

- can ban an action if it threatens public security

27
Q

Bakkee v University of California

A

CR, affirmative action, racial quotas are unconstitutional

28
Q

Gratz v Bollinger

A

CR, affirmative action, same thing that racial quotas are not OK but at U of M

29
Q

Grutter v Bollinger

A

civil rights, affirmative action; since race is not the sole determining factor it is not unconstitutional

30
Q

Lawrence & Gardener v Texas

A

substantive, due process, homosexual actions, violates due process clause

31
Q

Near v Minnesota

A

CL, 1st amend, incorporation of freedom of the press, injunctions=unconstitutional

32
Q

Everson v Board of Education

A

CL, 1st amend, relig incorporation, services are separate from religion (buses)

33
Q

McDonald v Chicago

A
  • 2nd amend, CL, incorporation of 2nd amend

- 14th amend= 2nd amend applicable to states

34
Q

Marbury v Madison

A
  • legitimacy of judicial review over congressional acts

- last-minute appointments by adams, sued for jobs