Cases Section 2B Flashcards
Nettship v Weston
Driver owes duty of care to passengers and other road users
Whitehouse v Jordan
Doctors owe duty of care
Condon v Basi
Sportsman owe duty to other sportsmen
Walker v Northumberland cc
Employer owes duty of care to employees
Hall v Simons
Lawyer owes duty to clients
Clanis v Camden and Islington
Public body owes duty of care to public
Siri’s v Moore
Judiciary owes duty to public
Capital and counties v Hampshire cc
Fire brigade owes duty to public
Robinson
- Pre existing duty
- Officer owes duty to public
Caparo
Novel situations, non pre-existing duty test
Kent v Griffith
Caparo test, 1. Damage is reasonably foreseeable
Bourhill v young
Caparo test 2. Proximity
Capital and counties plc v Hampshire cc
Caparo test 3. Fair, just and reasonable to impose duty of care claim on D
Brandon v Aitours
Contributory negligence: where c is partly at fault for accident
Froom v Butcher
Contributory negligence: where C’s actions made the injury/loss worse