Cases - Product Liability Flashcards

1
Q

Contract Law - privity of contract

A

Winterbottom v Wright

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Negligence

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negligence - manufacturer

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Negligence - ultimate consumer

A

Donoghue v Stevenson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Negligence - no recovery for pure economic loss

A

Murphy v Brentwood DC

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Negligence - 2nd hand car dealer = manufacturer

A

Andrews v Hopkinson

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Negligence - C hit by a wheel that came off a lorry was an ultimate consumer

A

Stennet v Hancock

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Negligence - duty to recall products if no longer as advertised

A

Hobbs ltd v Baxenden Chemical Co

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Negligence - negligence inferred from carelessness

A

Grant v Australian Knitting Mills

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Negligence - no breach when a faulty car ‘sold with warrant’

A

Hurley v Dyke

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Negligence - excludes exclusion clauses

A

Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Negligence - broken chain of causation

A

Evan v Triplex Glass

Kubach v Hollands

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

CPA - non-defect products and key quotes

A

Richardson v LRC products - clear warnings
Bogle v McDonalds - ‘legitimate consumer expectations’
Pollard v Tesco - consumers didn’t know what the British design standard was so didn’t matter it fell below it (weird ruling, CA)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

CPA - defective products

A

Abouzaid v Mothercare - harm was avoidable, could have provided warning, ‘general expectation’ for it to be safe

A v National Blood Authority - public have a ‘general expectation’ for blood to be safe

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly