Cases Flashcards
Van Duyn
Directives have direct effect
Marshall
Direct only have direct effect, no horizontal effect
Costa/ENEL
Primacy of EU law
Simmenthal
National law must be changed/set aside when incompatible with EU law
Kobler
MS liability for judicial breaches
Brasserie du pêcheur
Conflicting national law can give rise to MS liability
Foster
MS liability extends to - Established by Foster but changed to alternative by Farrell
- Public service or
- With special powers or
- Controlled by the state or
Marleasing and van Colson
National law must be interpreted in accordance with EU law
Tobacco case (Germany v. EP and Coucil and European Council)
To find the correct legal basis, apply the centre of gravity test
Francovich
MS liability criterion:
- Provision is intended to confer rights on 3rd parties
- Breach is sufficiently serious:
- Discretion? No = Simple breach is enough
- Discretion? Yes = The MS must have acted with gross negligence - Causal link between the breach and the damage
Van Gend & Loos (+ Defrenne)
For direct effect, the provision must be:
1. Clear
2. Precise
3. Unconditional
4. Have no implementing measures = Deleted by Defrenne
Broeckmeulen
What is a court/tribunal? A court whose judgement is
- Compulsory
- Independent
- Applies the rule of law
- Concrete
- Inter partes
- Of judicial nature
- Permanent
- Established by law
Foto-Frost
The national courts can refer questions to the ECJ in preliminary rulings
CILFIT
Act clair - National courts do not have to refer
Commission v. Portugal
A MS cannot invoke internal difficulties as a defence in infringement proceedings