Cases Flashcards
Van Duyn
Directives have direct effect
Marshall
Direct only have direct effect, no horizontal effect
Costa/ENEL
Primacy of EU law
Simmenthal
National law must be changed/set aside when incompatible with EU law
Kobler
MS liability for judicial breaches
Brasserie du pêcheur
Conflicting national law can give rise to MS liability
Foster
MS liability extends to - Established by Foster but changed to alternative by Farrell
- Public service or
- With special powers or
- Controlled by the state or
Marleasing and van Colson
National law must be interpreted in accordance with EU law
Tobacco case (Germany v. EP and Coucil and European Council)
To find the correct legal basis, apply the centre of gravity test
Francovich
MS liability criterion:
- Provision is intended to confer rights on 3rd parties
- Breach is sufficiently serious:
- Discretion? No = Simple breach is enough
- Discretion? Yes = The MS must have acted with gross negligence - Causal link between the breach and the damage
Van Gend & Loos (+ Defrenne)
For direct effect, the provision must be:
1. Clear
2. Precise
3. Unconditional
4. Have no implementing measures = Deleted by Defrenne
Broeckmeulen
What is a court/tribunal? A court whose judgement is
- Compulsory
- Independent
- Applies the rule of law
- Concrete
- Inter partes
- Of judicial nature
- Permanent
- Established by law
Foto-Frost
The national courts can refer questions to the ECJ in preliminary rulings
CILFIT
Act clair - National courts do not have to refer
Commission v. Portugal
A MS cannot invoke internal difficulties as a defence in infringement proceedings
Plaumann
Individual concern = If an affect affect an individual (or a group of) by reason of certain attributes which are peculiar to them or due to circumstances which differentiate them from all others
Bergardem
Establishes EU liability
Council v. Commission
Commission can withdraw proposal (until 1st reading) if raison d’être
Biocides
Legislator can choose between delegated and implementing act
Visa
Only delegated act can amend
Titanitum dioxides
Single legal basis if procedures are incompatible
Smart sanctions
Lex Specialis
Adelener
Indirect effect of directives
Faglia
You need a concrete case for preliminary rulings
Differdange
If MS has discretion, direct concern more difficult to establish
International Fruit Company
If MS has no discretion, direct concern is easier to establish
Greenpeace
Standing for interest groups
Jego-quere
Plaumann must be applied strictly
Inuit
Defines regulatory act (act of general application which is not a legislative act)
TWD
No plea of illegality if standing was possible under mother act but 2 months deadline had passed
Kendrian
Damages for 3rd parties must be claimed in front of the General Court
Akeberg Fransson
‘within the scope of EU law’ = Must respect FdRs
Digital rights
Test for FdRs limitations
Melloni
EU law prevails over national law even if FdRs protection is lower
Solange
FdRs are part of the common principles of all MS