cases Flashcards

1
Q

Whitely v Chapel (1868)
Offence to impersonate someone entitled to vote

A

Statutory interpretation, literal rule
Dead person not entitled to vote

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Fisher v bell (1961)
Illegal sale of flick knives

A

Statutory interpretation, literal rule
Flick knives weren’t technically for sale just offer to purchase

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

LNR v Berriman
Maintenance of track isnt considered repair

A

Statutory interpretation, literal rule
Example of injustice brought by literal rule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Adler v George (1964)
Man found inside RAF base

A

Statutory interpretation, Golden rule
In vicinity made to include In and around the base

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Smith v Hughes (1960)
Prostitutes soliciting

A

Statutory interpretation, Mischief rule
Calling from balconies and windows still made them guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

RCN v DHSS (1981)
abortion act 1967 stated only medical practitioners could give abortion pills

A

Statutory interpretation, mischief rule
Nurses were included to be medical practitioners as well. If it was literal, they would be guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Jones V tower boot (1997)
Worker was harassed and wanted to sue but couldnt since bullying wasnt part of the job

A

Statutory interpretation, purposive approach
was able to sue as purpose of the act was to prevent workplace discrimination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Hobbs v CG Robertson ltd (1970)
Workman injured his eye when brickwork splintered and claimed compensation yet failed

A

Eujesdem generis
Employers have a duty yo provide goggles when working with stone, concrete, slag or similar but brick wasnt considered ejusdem generis with them

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Tempest v kilner (1846)
whether statute of frauds applied to contract for the sale of stocks and shares

A

Expressio unius exclusio alterious
goods, wares and merchandise wasnt followed by any general words so stocks and shares werent included in the statute

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Inland revenue commissioners v frere (1965)

A

Noscitur a sociis

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Conway v rimmer (1968)

A

First case in which practice statement was used on a technical point

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly