cases Flashcards
victims own actions/escape attempts
roberts
bad medical treatment
cheshire
thin skull rule
blaue
acts of a third part
pagett
v refusing medical treatment
holland
key case: factual causation
white
key case: legal causation
kimsey
‘the unlawful
act must be a crime not a civil wrong’
franklin
the unlawful act must be a positive act not an omission
khan and khan
would a reasonable person observing see a risk of harm
church
would a danger be obvious that any sober and reasonable person
DPP v newbury and jones
the D must have the mens rea for the lesser unlawful act
goodfellow
contractual duty
pitwood - didn’t close train crossing gate
special relationship
gibbons and proctor - father let daughter starve
voluntary assumption of a duty
gibbon and proctor - fathers girlfriend let girl starve
creating a dangerous situation
miller - homeless man set fire to mattress
switch off life support
malcherik and steele - doctor switching off life support
factual causation - but for Ds actions…
white
legal causation - more than slight or trifling link
kimsey
indirect intent - was death a virtual certainty
woolin
cunningham
D drops gas meter off wall to steal money, gas leaks, poisons neighbour
R v G and R
two Ds burnt newspaper in bin and left. assumed fire would go out, co op burnt down
transferred malice
latimer
D must do an act
Ireland
letters/emails ect assault
constanza
v must apprehend force
lamb
jokes can be an assault
logden
threat of force must be immediate
smith v chief working police
words may negate an assault
tuberville v savage
immediate unlawful force
venna
does D have intention
Mohan
recklessness
cunningham
any touching may be a battery
lord goff collins v wilcock
clothing - battery
thomas
indirect battery is still a battery
martin
touching must be unlawful
wilson v pringle
v must have abh injuries
miller
ruling in miller
any hurt or injury calculated to intefere with the health and comfort of a victim must be more than trifling
ruling in chan fook
must not be so trivial as to be wholly insignificant
psychiatric injury
ireland/burstow
temporary loss of consciousness
T v DPP
cutting the Vs hair
smith
GBH is injury that breaks both layers of the skin
eisenhower
GBH injury is ‘nothing more or nothing less than really serious harm’
DPP v smith
accumulation of injuries can amount to GBH
brown/stratton
vulnerable victim-more serious injury
bollom
mens rea- inflict SOME harm
mowatt
intention to resist arrest
morrison/mowatt