Cases Flashcards
Refuses to apply the Supreme Court formula for the assessment of damages, court did not permit it, retrial ordered
McDonnell V Byrne engineers 1978
McDonnell V Byrne engineers 1978
Refuses to apply the Supreme Court formula for the assessment of damages, court did not permit it, retrial ordered
D.D.P V Bartley 1997
Relevant factors included a guilty plea and the effects of his abuse on the victim, the obiter is that there is no common law duty on gardaí to investigate credible complaints. Obiter statement here is more significant
Relevant factors included a guilty plea and the effects of his abase on the victim, the obiter is that there is o common law duty on gardaí to investigate credible complaints. Obiter statement is more significant here
D.P.P. V Bartley 1997
Definition of ratio
Considine v. Shannon Regional Fisheries Board, [1994]
Considine v. Shannon Regional Fisheries Board, [1994]
Definition of ratio
Donoghue V Stevenson 1932
the ratio of a case is often not clear until a subsequent court determines what is
the binding legal principle contained within it. Concept of duty of care (reasonable foreseeability). Foundation of negligence law
the ratio of a case is often not clear until a subsequent court determines what is
the binding legal principle contained within it. Concept of duty of care (reasonable foreseeability). Foundation of negligence law
Donoghue v Stevenson 1932
D.p.p. V haughney
Raised an issue on the fact that public image would affect his trial
Raised an issue on the fact that public image would affect his trial
DPP V haughney
D.P.P. v F.E [2017]
Egyptian muslim accused of domestic
abuse worried about racial prejudice
Egyptian muslim accused of domestic
abuse worried about racial prejudice
DDP V F.E 2017
R. V. Boseley (2008)
Rape myths, prejudice, group mentality (defense showed underwear as evidence of consent)
Rape myths, prejudice, group mentality (defense showed underwear as evidence of consent)
R V Boseley 2008
Dottrine of unenumerated and derived rights was First recognised, with reference to article 40.3. Right to bodily integrity
Ryan v A.G. 1965
